Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340993›Full record

ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2019

A Phase I Study to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single-agent Lorvotuzumab Mertansine (IMGN901) in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory CD-56-positive Multiple Myeloma.

Sikander Ailawadhi, Kevin R Kelly, Robert A Vescio, Sundar Jagannath, Jeffrey Wolf, Mecide Gharibo, Taimur Sher, Leyla Bojanini, Maurice Kirby, Asher Chanan-Khan

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CD56 on immune and tumor cells: what is known and beyond?Clinical and experimental immunology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sikander AilawadhiDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. Electronic address: ailawadhi.sikander@mayo.edu.
Kevin R KellyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Robert A VescioMultiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Sundar JagannathDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.
Jeffrey WolfMyeloma Program, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Mecide GhariboDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Taimur SherDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Leyla BojaniniDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Maurice KirbyImmunogen Inc, Boston, MA.
Asher Chanan-KhanDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USImmunoGen (United States) · USJacksonville College · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Saul Priceman · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite therapeutic advancements that have significantly improved outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM have an aggressive disease course, with inferior outcomes, necessitating the need for agents with novel therapeutic mechanisms. We present the results of a completed phase I trial of single-agent lorvotuzumab mertansine, a unique antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD56, which is frequently expressed in MM. PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty-seven patients with relapsed MM were enrolled in a dose-escalation phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of lorvotuzumab mertansine (112 mg/m

resultsDespite a high proportion of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (56.8%), stable disease or better was noted in 42.9% of patients, and these patients had a long duration of response (median, 15.5 months). The adverse event profile was favorable, with a low incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events and no infusion-related reactions. No humoral responses were detected against the study drug.

conclusionThis completed phase I trial of single-agent lorvotuzumab mertansine provides ample evidence of safety and signals of clinical activity for this agent, warranting its further clinical development as part of combination regimens for the management of MM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalCD56 AntigenFemaleHumansMaleMaytansineMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaRecurrenceAntibodies, MonoclonalCD56 Antigenlorvotuzumab mertansineMaytansineAntibody-drug conjugateDrug-developmentEfficacyImmunotherapyMonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID30340993
PMCPMC9059793
OpenAlexW2891360972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.