Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340884›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Epidemiologic and economic impact of pharmacies as vaccination locations during an influenza epidemic.

Sarah M Bartsch, Michael S Taitel, Jay V DePasse, Sarah N Cox, Renae L Smith-Ray, Patrick Wedlock, Tanya G Singh, Susan Carr, Sheryl S Siegmund, Bruce Y Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pharmacy-based immunization: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah M BartschPublic Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Michael S TaitelWalgreens Center for Health & Wellbeing Research, Walgreens Company, Deerfield, IL, United States.
Jay V DePassePittsburgh Super Computing Center (PSC), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Sarah N CoxPublic Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Renae L Smith-RayWalgreens Center for Health & Wellbeing Research, Walgreens Company, Deerfield, IL, United States.
Patrick WedlockPublic Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Tanya G SinghWalgreens Center for Health & Wellbeing Research, Walgreens Company, Deerfield, IL, United States.
Susan CarrJohns Hopkins Healthcare Solutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sheryl S SiegmundPublic Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Bruce Y LeePublic Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: brucelee@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USWalgreens (United States) · USPittsburgh Supercomputing Center · US

Funding

MIDAS Informatics Services Group (ISG)U24GM110707 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ESPINO, JESSI U, WAGNER, MICHAEL MATTHEW · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
Regional Healthcare Ecosystem Analyst for Healthcare Associated InfectionsR01HS023317 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, BRUCE Y · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS023317NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM110707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring an influenza epidemic, where early vaccination is crucial, pharmacies may be a resource to increase vaccine distribution reach and capacity.

methodsWe utilized an agent-based model of the US and a clinical and economics outcomes model to simulate the impact of different influenza epidemics and the impact of utilizing pharmacies in addition to traditional (hospitals, clinic/physician offices, and urgent care centers) locations for vaccination for the year 2017.

resultsFor an epidemic with a reproductive rate (R0) of 1.30, adding pharmacies with typical business hours averted 11.9 million symptomatic influenza cases, 23,577 to 94,307 deaths, $1.0 billion in direct (vaccine administration and healthcare) costs, $4.2-44.4 billion in productivity losses, and $5.2-45.3 billion in overall costs (varying with mortality rate). Increasing the epidemic severity (R0 of 1.63), averted 16.0 million symptomatic influenza cases, 35,407 to 141,625 deaths, $1.9 billion in direct costs, $6.0-65.5 billion in productivity losses, and $7.8-67.3 billion in overall costs (varying with mortality rate). Extending pharmacy hours averted up to 16.5 million symptomatic influenza cases, 145,278 deaths, $1.9 billion direct costs, $4.1 billion in productivity loss, and $69.5 billion in overall costs. Adding pharmacies resulted in a cost-benefit of $4.1 to $11.5 billion, varying epidemic severity, mortality rate, pharmacy hours, location vaccination rate, and delay in the availability of the vaccine.

conclusionsAdministering vaccines through pharmacies in addition to traditional locations in the event of an epidemic can increase vaccination coverage, mitigating up to 23.7 million symptomatic influenza cases, providing cost-savings up to $2.8 billion to third-party payers and $99.8 billion to society. Pharmacies should be considered as points of dispensing epidemic vaccines in addition to traditional settings as soon as vaccines become available.

Indexed as

EpidemicsPharmaciesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesEconomicEpidemicInfluenzaPharmaciesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID30340884
PMCPMC6279616
OpenAlexW2897167301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.