Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340646›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and predictors of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in Adigrat General Hospital, Northern Ethiopia.

Senait Tadesse, Tsega Kahsay, Gebre Adhanom, Getachew Kahsu, Haftom Legese, Aderajew G/Wahid, Awoke Derbie

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Research Progress on perinatalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Asymptomatic bacteriuria of pregnant women in a tertiary care centre.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Senait TadesseCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia. tadesenait@gmail.com.
Tsega KahsayCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Gebre AdhanomCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Getachew KahsuCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Haftom LegeseCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Aderajew G/WahidCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Awoke DerbieDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Adigrat University · ETAddis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveApproach to asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in Ethiopia is mainly based on clinical grounds and urine strip and microscopy tests. On top of this, the treatment is also on an empirical basis which may leads to an increased antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and associated factors of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in Adigrat Hospital, Northern Ethiopia.

resultsOut of 259 pregnant women included in the study, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was at 55 (21.2%). Gram negative bacteria, specifically Escherichia coli were the predominant isolates followed by Klebsiella species and Proteus mirabilis. Of the Gram positive identified bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus was main isolate. Age of the mother (18-25 years old) with [AOR = 8.5, 95% CI (2.2, 32.9)], family income (< 1000 ETB) with [AOR = 7.5, 95% CI = (2.4, 23.1)] and gestational period at 1st trimester [AOR = 11.9, 95% CI (4.4, 32.4)] and 2nd trimester [AOR; 5.6, 95% CI (2.0, 15.5%)] were predictors significantly associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria. All Gram negative isolates were found 100% resistance to Ampicllin. Moreover, all Gram positive isolates were found sensitive to Vancomycin at 100%.

Indexed as

Ampicillin ResistanceVancomycin ResistanceAdolescentAdultAsymptomatic InfectionsBacteriuriaEthiopiaFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceYoung AdultAdigrat General HospitalAntimicrobial susceptibility profileAsymptomatic bacteriuriaPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID30340646
PMCPMC6194591
OpenAlexW2896636043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.