Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340623›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2018

Toothbrushing: to the best of one's abilities is possibly not good enough.

Renate Deinzer, Stefanie Ebel, Helen Blättermann, Ulrike Weik, Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cleansing efficacy of the electric toothbrush Oral-BClinical oral investigations · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Salivary Flow Rate During Toothbrushing.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renate DeinzerDepartment of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany. renate.deinzer@mp.jlug.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-4029
Stefanie EbelDepartment of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Helen BlättermannDepartment of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Ulrike WeikDepartment of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Jutta Margraf-StiksrudDepartment of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, D-35032, Marburg, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeaknesses in toothbrushing performance can be seen when young adults are instructed to perform habitual toothbrushing. Nothing is known about toothbrushing behavior when instructed to perform to the best abilities. The present study analyzes such behavior and compares it to habitual behavior.

methodsA random sample of N = 98 young adults born in 1995 was examined in 2014/2015.They were asked to perform oral hygiene to the best of their abilities in front of a camera. Videos were analyzed regarding details of brushing behavior. A quality index was developed which describes the extent of the neglect of brushing on palatinal and vestibular surfaces. Data were compared to those of an earlier study of young adults (born in 1992, examined in 2011, N = 101) who were asked to perform oral hygiene as they habitually do.

resultsThe 1995 cohort (best abilities) brushed their teeth significantly longer than the 1992 cohort (habitual brushing). This was due to significant longer brushing at vestibular and occlusal surfaces. Neglect of palatinal surfaces was similar in both cohorts. Groups did not differ regarding brushing movements. 40% of the brushing time on lateral surfaces was spent with scrubbing movements despite opposing advice in common oral hygiene instructions.

conclusionsToothbrushing to the best of one's abilities might still not be good enough. Young adults apparently lack a reasonable concept of what is meant by high quality toothbrushing. More efforts should thus be undertaken to explain them (and adults) this concept.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorFemaleGermanyHumansMaleToothbrushingVideo RecordingYoung AdultBehavioral scienceCommunity dentistryDental educationDental hygieneOral hygienePreventive dentistryToothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID30340623
PMCPMC6194646
OpenAlexW2897987218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.