Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340568›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2018

Voices that matter: end-of-life care in two acute hospitals from the perspective of bereaved relatives.

Sarah Donnelly, Geraldine Prizeman, Diarmuid Ó Coimín, Bettina Korn, Geralyn Hynes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Operationalising palliative care integration: Experiences of implementers in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah DonnellySchool of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. sarah.donnelly@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5436-3195
Geraldine PrizemanTrinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin, D02 T283, Ireland.
Diarmuid Ó CoimínMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Bettina Korn1st Floor CEO Building, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Geralyn HynesTrinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin, D02 T283, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IEMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IESt. James's Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Royal City of Dublin Hospital Trust 14021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnd-of-life care (EoLC) is an experience that touches the lives of everyone. Dying in an acute hospital is a common occurrence in developed countries across the world. Previous studies have shown that there is wide variation in EoLC and at times is experienced as being of poor quality. Assessing and measuring the quality of care provided is a key component of all healthcare systems. This paper reports on the qualitative analysis of open-ended free text questions that were asked as part of a post-bereavement survey conducted in two adult acute hospitals in Ireland.

methodsThis was a quantitative descriptive post-bereavement postal survey, gathering data retrospectively from relatives or friends of patients who died, utilising an adapted version of the VOICES (Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services) questionnaire. VOICES MaJam has 29 core questions, seven questions requesting personal demographic information and four open-ended questions gathering descriptive data about the care experience during the patient's last admission to hospital. A total of 356 valid questionnaires were returned. Qualitative data were managed, coded and analysed with NVivo 10, using a template analysis framework approach.

resultsThree quarters (75%: n = 268) responded to at least one of the open-ended questions. Several key themes emerged, indicating areas that require particular attention in EoLC. Two themes relate to how care needs are met and how the hospital environment has a critical influence on EoLC experiences. The remaining three themes relate more to the interpersonal context including whether patients are treated with dignity and respect, the psychological, emotional and spiritual needs of patients and their family members and communication.

conclusionsAcute hospitals need to ensure that patients and their relatives receive high quality EoLC. Seeking the views of bereaved relatives should be considered by all hospitals and healthcare settings to ascertain the quality of care at end of life. This study contributes to our understanding and knowledge of what good EoLC looks like and where care can be improved, thus enabling hospitals to direct and inform quality improvement.

Indexed as

AftercareAfter-Hours CareAttitude of Health PersonnelBereavementFamilyHealth Care SurveysHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePalliative CarePersonhoodQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesTerminal CareAcute hospitalBereaved relativesBereavementDyingEnd-of-life carePalliative careQualitativeQuality of careVOICES

Identifiers

PMID30340568
PMCPMC6195738
OpenAlexW2896029649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.