Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340491›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Impact of results-based financing on effective obstetric care coverage: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Malawi.

Stephan Brenner, Jacob Mazalale, Danielle Wilhelm, Robin C Nesbitt, Terhi J Lohela, Jobiba Chinkhumba, Julia Lohmann, Adamson S Muula, Manuela De Allegri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephan BrennerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. stephan.brenner@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-7008
Jacob MazalaleDepartment of Economics, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Danielle WilhelmHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Robin C NesbittHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Terhi J LohelaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 20, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Jobiba ChinkhumbaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Julia LohmannHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Adamson S MuulaDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Manuela De AllegriHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid MWI 12/0010United States Agency for International Development GHS-A-00-09-00015-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults-based financing (RBF) describes health system approaches addressing both service quality and use. Effective coverage is a metric measuring progress towards universal health coverage (UHC). Although considered a means towards achieving UHC in settings with weak health financing modalities, the impact of RBF on effective coverage has not been explicitly studied.

methodsMalawi introduced the Results-Based Financing For Maternal and Neonatal Health (RBF4MNH) Initiative in 2013 to improve quality of maternal and newborn health services at emergency obstetric care facilities. Using a quasi-experimental design, we examined the impact of the RBF4MNH on both crude and effective coverage of pregnant women across four districts during the two years following implementation.

resultsThere was no effect on crude coverage. With a larger proportion of women in intervention areas receiving more effective care over time, the overall net increase in effective coverage was 7.1%-points (p = 0.07). The strongest impact on effective coverage (31.0%-point increase, p = 0.02) occurred only at lower cut-off level (60% of maximum score) of obstetric care effectiveness. Design-specific and wider health system factors likely limited the program's potential to produce stronger effects.

conclusionThe RBF4MNH improved effective coverage of pregnant women and seems to be a promising reform approach towards reaching UHC. Given the short study period, the full potential of the current RBF scheme has likely not yet been reached.

Indexed as

Healthcare FinancingMaternal-Child Health ServicesAdultChildContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalawiPregnancyProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareUniversal Health InsuranceEffective coverageHealth care financingMaternal and child healthQuality of careResults-based financing

Identifiers

PMID30340491
PMCPMC6194711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.