Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340480›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2018

Medication review plus person-centred care: a feasibility study of a pharmacy-health psychology dual intervention to improve care for people living with dementia.

Ian D Maidment, Sarah Damery, Niyah Campbell, Nichola Seare, Chris Fox, Steve Iliffe, Andrea Hilton, Graeme Brown, Nigel Barnes, Jane Wilcock and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ian D MaidmentSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK. i.maidment@aston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4152-9704
Sarah DameryInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Niyah CampbellSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Nichola SeareAston Health Research Innovation Cluster, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Chris FoxNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Earlham Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Steve IliffeResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Andrea HiltonFaculty of Health Science, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Graeme BrownBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Unit 1, B1, 50 Summer Hill Road, Birmingham, B1 3RB, UK.
Nigel BarnesBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Unit 1, B1, 50 Summer Hill Road, Birmingham, B1 3RB, UK.
Jane WilcockResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Emma RandleNational Centre for Mental Health, Research and Innovation Department, The Barberry, 25 Vincent Drive, Birmingham, B15 2FG, UK.
Sarah GillespieDepartment of Clinical Healthcare, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK.
Garry BartonNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Earlham Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Rachel ShawSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Aston University · GBBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBOxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0613-31071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Behaviour that Challenges" is common in people living with dementia, resident in care homes and historically has been treated with anti-psychotics. However, such usage is associated with 1800 potentially avoidable deaths annually in the UK. This study investigated the feasibility of a full clinical trial of a specialist dementia care pharmacist medication review combined with a health psychology intervention for care staff to limit the use of psychotropics. This paper focuses on feasibility; including recruitment and retention, implementation of medication change recommendations and the experiences and expectations of care staff.

methodsWest Midlands care homes and individuals meeting the inclusion criteria (dementia diagnosis; medication for behaviour that challenges), or their personal consultee, were approached for consent. A specialist pharmacist reviewed medication. Care home staff received an educational behaviour change intervention in a three-hour session promoting person-centred care. Primary healthcare staff received a modified version of the training. The primary outcome measure was the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version at 3 months. Other outcomes included quality of life, cognition, health economics and prescribed medication. A qualitative evaluation explored expectations and experiences of care staff.

resultsFive care homes and 34 of 108 eligible residents (31.5%) were recruited, against an original target of 45 residents across 6 care homes. Medication reviews were conducted for 29 study participants (85.3%) and the pharmacist recommended stopping or reviewing medication in 21 cases (72.4%). Of the recommendations made, 57.1% (12 of 21) were implemented, and implementation (discontinuation) took a mean of 98.4 days. In total, 164 care staff received training and 21 were interviewed. Care staff reported a positive experience of the intervention and post intervention adopting a more holistic patient-centred approach.

conclusionsThe intervention contained two elements; staff training and medication review. It was feasible to implement the staff training, and the training appeared to increase the ability and confidence of care staff to manage behaviour that challenges without the need for medication. The medication review would require significant modification for full trial partly related to the relatively limited uptake of the recommendations made, and delay in implementation.

trial registrationISRCTN58330068 . Registered 15 October 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical ServicesAgedBehavioral MedicineCaregiversDementiaDisease ManagementFeasibility StudiesHomes for the AgedHumansMedication ReconciliationNursing HomesPatient-Centered CareQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSelf CareBehaviour that challengesCare homesDementiaMedication reviewPharmacyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID30340480
PMCPMC6194710
OpenAlexW2892898209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.