ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2019
Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus determined by systematic quantification of epithelial glands using volumetric laser endomicroscopy.
Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus: ready for primetime.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) lesions ≤2 cm in size can be targeted for en-bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). White-light endoscopy can underestimate the size of a lesion, limiting complete resection. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) provides high-resolution cross-sectional imaging of BE. Epithelial glands are a VLE feature associated with BE dysplasia. We study the association between VLE gland quantification and outcome of resection.
methodsEMR specimens of BE lesions targeted for en-bloc resection were imaged with VLE using an established protocol. Manual and automated quantification of epithelial glands was performed blinded to resection outcome. The presence of epithelial glands at the resection margins was recorded. Histologic en-bloc (R0) resection of the targeted lesion was defined by the absence and incomplete (R1) resection by the presence of dysplasia/neoplasia at specimen margins.
resultsThirty-seven EMRs with a mean (standard deviation) size of 1.04 (0.37) cm were imaged with VLE. The highest grade of dysplasia found was low-grade dysplasia (n = 12), high-grade dysplasia (n = 19), and intramucosal cancer (n = 6). The en-bloc resection rate was 37.8% (R0, n = 14; R1, n = 23). The mean (standard deviation) number of epithelial glands quantified with VLE was 13.0 (6.7) and 28.8 (23.9) for R0 and R1 specimens, respectively, with a significant mean difference of 15.8 glands (95% confidence interval, 2-29; P = .02). The presence of glands at the specimen margin was associated with incomplete resection (P < .001).
conclusionSystematic quantification of BE epithelial glands using VLE can determine the outcome of endoscopic resection. VLE may have a potential role in assessment of lesion margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.