Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30339574›Full record

ArticleMedical care2018

Assessing the Impact of Body Mass Index Information on the Performance of Risk Adjustment Models in Predicting Health Care Costs and Utilization.

Hadi Kharrazi, Hsien-Yen Chang, Sara E Heins, Jonathan P Weiner, Kimberly A Gudzune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hadi KharraziDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Population Health IT, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Hsien-Yen ChangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Population Health IT, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Sara E HeinsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Population Health IT, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Jonathan P WeinerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Population Health IT, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Kimberly A GudzuneDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Funding

Reducing obesity among public housing residents: an ecological approachK23HL116601 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GUDZUNE, KIMBERLY ANNE · 2013 to 2017
$778k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL116601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing electronic health records (EHRs) for population risk stratification has gained attention in recent years. Compared with insurance claims, EHRs offer novel data types (eg, vital signs) that can potentially improve population-based predictive models of cost and utilization.

objectiveTo evaluate whether EHR-extracted body mass index (BMI) improves the performance of diagnosis-based models to predict concurrent and prospective health care costs and utilization.

methodsWe used claims and EHR data over a 2-year period from a cohort of continuously insured patients (aged 20-64 y) within an integrated health system. We examined the addition of BMI to 3 diagnosis-based models of increasing comprehensiveness (ie, demographics, Charlson, and Dx-PM model of the Adjusted Clinical Group system) to predict concurrent and prospective costs and utilization, and compared the performance of models with and without BMI.

resultsThe study population included 59,849 patients, 57% female, with BMI class I, II, and III comprising 19%, 9%, and 6% of the population. Among demographic models, R improvement from adding BMI ranged from 61% (ie, R increased from 0.56 to 0.90) for prospective pharmacy cost to 29% (1.24-1.60) for concurrent medical cost. Adding BMI to demographic models improved the prediction of all binary service-linked outcomes (ie, hospitalization, emergency department admission, and being in top 5% total costs) with area under the curve increasing from 2% (0.602-0.617) to 7% (0.516-0.554). Adding BMI to Charlson models only improved total and medical cost predictions prospectively (13% and 15%; 4.23-4.79 and 3.30-3.79), and also improved predicting all prospective outcomes with area under the curve increasing from 3% (0.649-0.668) to 4% (0.639-0.665; and, 0.556-0.576). No improvements in prediction were seen in the most comprehensive model (ie, Dx-PM). DISCUSSION: EHR-extracted BMI levels can be used to enhance predictive models of utilization especially if comprehensive diagnostic data are missing.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultDemographyElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePharmaceutical ServicesRetrospective StudiesRisk AdjustmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30339574
PMCPMC6231962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.