ArticleLab on a chip2018
Microfluidic-based solid phase extraction of cell free DNA.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- A Lab-on-a-Chip for the Extraction and Analysis of Single Molecules of DNA from Biological Media.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for Blood Disorders and Hematological Disease Monitoring and Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Profiling KRAS mutations in whole blood by error-corrected maximum depth sequencing.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Magnetic Nanoparticle-Integrated Microfluidic Chip Enables Reliable Isolation of Plasma Cell-Free DNA for Molecular Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Integrated Immunoaffinity Extraction, Solid-Phase Extraction, and Fluorescent Labeling of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.Precision chemistry · 2025Article
- The development and applications of circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA and other emerging biomarkers for early cancer detection.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- A Single Microfluidic Device Approach to Direct Isolation, Purification, and Amplification of cfDNA from Undiluted Plasma.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2025Article
- High-throughput extraction on a dynamic solid phase for low-abundance biomarker isolation from biological samples.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Article
- ctDNA as a novel and promising approach for cancer diagnosis: a focus on hepatocellular carcinoma.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Advances in novel strategies for isolation, characterization, and analysis of CTCs and ctDNA.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- Biomedical Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Recent advances for cancer detection and treatment by microfluidic technology, review and update.Biological procedures online · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Device Engineering and Computational Analysis for Characterization of Cell-Released Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Microfluidics for Cancer Biomarker Discovery, Research, and Clinical Application.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Advances in Microfluidics for the Implementation of Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Routine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Analytical Technologies for Liquid Biopsy of Subcellular Materials.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021Article
- System Modularity Chip for Analysis of Rare Targets (SMART-Chip): Liquid Biopsy Samples.ACS sensors · 2021Article
- An Overview on Microfluidic Systems for Nucleic Acids Extraction from Human Raw Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Emerging Lab-on-a-Chip Approaches for Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: Status in CTCs and ctDNA Research and Clinical Validation.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a liquid biopsy marker that can carry signatures (i.e., mutations) associated with certain pathological conditions. Therefore, the extraction of cfDNA from a variety of clinical samples can be an effective and minimally invasive source of markers for disease detection and subsequent management. In the oncological diseases, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a cfDNA sub-class, can carry clinically actionable mutations and coupled with next generation sequencing or other mutation detection methods provide a venue for effective in vitro diagnostics. However, cfDNA mutational analyses require high quality inputs. This necessitates extraction platforms that provide high recovery over the entire ctDNA size range (50 → 150 bp) with minimal interferences (i.e., co-extraction of genomic DNA), and high reproducibility with a simple workflow. Herein, we present a novel microfluidic solid-phase extraction device (μSPE) consisting of a plastic chip that is activated with UV/O3 to generate surface-confined carboxylic acid functionalities for the μSPE of cfDNA. The μSPE uses an immobilization buffer (IB) consisting of polyethylene glycol and salts that induce cfDNA condensation onto the activated plastic microfluidic surface. The μSPE consists of an array of micropillars to increase extraction bed load (scalable to loads >700 ng of cfDNA) and can be produced at low-cost using replication-based techniques. The entire μSPE can be fabricated in a single molding step negating the need for adding additional extraction supports to the device simplifying production and keeping device and assay cost low. The μSPE allowed for recoveries >90% of model cfDNA fragments across a range of sizes (100-700 bp) and even the ability to extract efficiently short cfDNA fragments (50 bp, >70%). In addition, the composition of the IB allowed for reducing the interference of co-extracted genomic DNA. We demonstrated the clinical utility of the μSPE by quantifying the levels of cfDNA in healthy donors and patients with non-small-cell lung and colorectal cancers. μSPE extracted cfDNA from plasma samples was also subjected to a ligase detection reaction (LDR) for determining the presence of mutations in the KRAS gene for colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.