Observational studyEuropean journal of heart failure2019
Heart failure in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: findings from the BIOSTAT-CHF study.
Observational study in European journal of heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outpatient treatment of worsening heart failure with intravenous and subcutaneous diuretics: a systematic review of the literature.ESC heart failure · 2020Pooled it
- Highlights in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2019Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of a Low-Cost LDH-Hemoglobin-Albumin Biomarker Panel in Acute Heart Failure: A Real-World Cohort from a Resource-Limited Setting.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Worsening heart failure-based hierarchical endpoints beyond HF hospitalization: expert opinion paper.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Association of blood essential and non-essential element levels with echocardiographic parameters among Saudi heart failure patients: a case-control study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A Contemporary Perspective on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Classification: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Time to Death by Suicide in an Epidemiological Sample of Veterans With an Inpatient Hospitalization for Heart Failure.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025Article
- Worsening heart failure: progress, pitfalls, and perspectives.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of heart failure across the spectrum of ejection fraction: a population cohort study.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2025Article
- Inpatient vs. Outpatient: A Systematic Review of Information Needs throughout the Heart Failure Patient Journey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Chronic heart failure: the role of di vericiguat.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Treatment outcomes and associated factors among chronic ambulatory heart failure patients at Jimma Medical Center, South West Ethiopia: prospective observational study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Observational
- Prognostic role of renal replacement therapy among hospitalized patients with heart failure in the Brazilian national public health system.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Defining the Phenotypes for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Current heart failure reports · 2022Review
- Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2022Article
- Analysis of Worsening Heart Failure Events in an Integrated Health Care System.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and hospital utilization in heart failure: a nationwide cohort study.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Nutritional and Non-Nutritional Predictors of Low Spot Urinary Creatinine Concentration in Patients with Heart Failure.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Impact of mitral regurgitation in patients with worsening heart failure: insights from BIOSTAT-CHF.European journal of heart failure · 2021Article
- High-density lipoprotein-mediated cardioprotection in heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) require additive therapies and have a poor prognosis. However, patient characteristics and clinical outcome between HF patients treated in the outpatient setting vs. those who are hospitalized remain scarce. METHODS AND
resultsThe BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure (BIOSTAT-CHF) included 2516 patients with symptoms and/or signs of HF: 1694 as inpatients and 822 as outpatients. Compared to ambulatory HF patients, inpatients had higher heart rate, urea, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, lower blood pressure, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, sodium, potassium, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, had more often peripheral oedema, diabetes, anaemia, and were less often treated with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Outpatients had a more frequent history of HF hospitalization and received more frequently beta-blockers and/or ACEi/angiotensin receptor blockers up-titrated to target doses (P < 0.001). Inpatients had higher rates of the primary outcome of death or HF hospitalization: incidence rate per 100 person-years of 33.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.1-35.9] for inpatients vs. 18.5 (95% CI 16.4-21.0) for outpatients; adjusted hazard ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.07-1.43). Subdividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories, the primary outcome event rates were 14.3 (95% CI 12.3-16.7), 36.6 (95% CI 32.2-41.5), and 71.3 (95% CI 64.4-79.0) for inpatients vs. 8.4 (95% CI 6.6-10.6), 29.8 (95% CI 24.5-36.2), and 43.3 (95% CI 34.7-54.0) for outpatients, respectively. These findings were externally replicated.
conclusionsMarked differences were observed between inpatients and outpatients with HF. Overall, inpatients were sicker and had higher event rates. However, a substantial proportion of outpatients had similar or higher event rates compared to inpatients. These findings suggest that HF outpatients also have poor prognosis and may be the focus of future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.