Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338883›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of heart failure2019

Heart failure in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: findings from the BIOSTAT-CHF study.

João Pedro Ferreira, Marco Metra, Ify Mordi, John Gregson, Jozine M Ter Maaten, Jasper Tromp, Stefan D Anker, Kenneth Dickstein, Hans L Hillege, Leong L Ng and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Highlights in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Time to Death by Suicide in an Epidemiological Sample of Veterans With an Inpatient Hospitalization for Heart Failure.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Chronic heart failure: the role of di vericiguat.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

João Pedro FerreiraINSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy and F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
Marco MetraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Ify MordiDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
John GregsonDepartment of Biostatistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jozine M Ter MaatenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jasper TrompDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stefan D AnkerDivision of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Kenneth DicksteinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hans L HillegeDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Leong L NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK, and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Dirk J van VeldhuisenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Chim C LangDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Adriaan A VoorsDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Faiez ZannadINSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy and F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLInserm · FRUniversity of Groningen · NLGlenfield Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNinewells Hospital · GBUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Chief Scientist Office PCL/17/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) require additive therapies and have a poor prognosis. However, patient characteristics and clinical outcome between HF patients treated in the outpatient setting vs. those who are hospitalized remain scarce. METHODS AND

resultsThe BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure (BIOSTAT-CHF) included 2516 patients with symptoms and/or signs of HF: 1694 as inpatients and 822 as outpatients. Compared to ambulatory HF patients, inpatients had higher heart rate, urea, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, lower blood pressure, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, sodium, potassium, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, had more often peripheral oedema, diabetes, anaemia, and were less often treated with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Outpatients had a more frequent history of HF hospitalization and received more frequently beta-blockers and/or ACEi/angiotensin receptor blockers up-titrated to target doses (P < 0.001). Inpatients had higher rates of the primary outcome of death or HF hospitalization: incidence rate per 100 person-years of 33.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.1-35.9] for inpatients vs. 18.5 (95% CI 16.4-21.0) for outpatients; adjusted hazard ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.07-1.43). Subdividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories, the primary outcome event rates were 14.3 (95% CI 12.3-16.7), 36.6 (95% CI 32.2-41.5), and 71.3 (95% CI 64.4-79.0) for inpatients vs. 8.4 (95% CI 6.6-10.6), 29.8 (95% CI 24.5-36.2), and 43.3 (95% CI 34.7-54.0) for outpatients, respectively. These findings were externally replicated.

conclusionsMarked differences were observed between inpatients and outpatients with HF. Overall, inpatients were sicker and had higher event rates. However, a substantial proportion of outpatients had similar or higher event rates compared to inpatients. These findings suggest that HF outpatients also have poor prognosis and may be the focus of future trials.

Indexed as

InpatientsOutpatientsAgedDisease ProgressionDiureticsEuropeFemaleFurosemideHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleProspective StudiesDiureticsFurosemideEntry criteriaHeart failureRisk levelsTrials

Identifiers

PMID30338883
OpenAlexW2897064634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.