Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338871›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

Towards a 'resolution limit' for DW-MRI tumor microstructural models: A simulation study investigating the feasibility of distinguishing between microstructural changes.

Damien J McHugh, Penny L Hubbard Cristinacce, Josephine H Naish, Geoffrey J M Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Damien J McHughDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Penny L Hubbard CristinacceDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Josephine H NaishDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey J M ParkerDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the feasibility of extracting sufficiently precise estimates of cell radius, R, and intracellular volume fraction, f

methodsSimulations with optimized and non-optimized clinical acquisitions were performed for a range of microstructures, using a two-compartment model. The ability to distinguish between (i) cell shrinkage with cell density constant, mimicking apoptosis, and (ii) cell size constant with cell density decreasing, mimicking loss of cells, was evaluated based on the precision of simulated parameter estimates. Relationships between parameter precision, SNR, and the magnitude of specific parameter changes, were used to infer SNR requirements for detecting changes.

resultsAccuracy and precision depended on microstructural properties, SNR, and the acquisition protocol. The main benefit of optimized acquisitions tended to be improved accuracy and precision of R, particularly for small cells. In most cases considered, higher SNR was required for detecting changes in R than for changes in f

conclusionsGiven the relative changes in R and f

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsApoptosisAxonsBiomarkersComputer SimulationFeasibility StudiesHumansNeoplasmsNormal DistributionReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise RatioBiomarkersdiffusion-weighted MRImicrostructural changesoptimum designresolution limittumor microstructure

Identifiers

PMID30338871
PMCPMC6492139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.