SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018
Drugs for preventing red blood cell dehydration in people with sickle cell disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Regular long-term red blood cell transfusions for managing chronic chest complications in sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Regular long-term red blood cell transfusions for managing chronic chest complications in sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- [Dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis in 23 cases: a single-center retrospective cohort study from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (2018-2024)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- The Heat Is On: Climate Change Implications for Pregnant Women with Sickle Cell Disease.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- A novel composition of endogenous metabolic modulators improves red blood cell properties in sickle cell disease.EJHaem · 2024Article
- Lactate: A Theranostic Biomarker for Metabolic Psychiatry?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Role of Non-genetic Therapies to Reduce the Incidence of Sickle Cell Crisis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Low-Molecular-Weight Synthetic Antioxidants: Classification, Pharmacological Profile, Effectiveness and Trends.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- GBT1118, a voxelotor analog, protects red blood cells from damage during severe hypoxia.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Trends in Piezo Channel Research Over the Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Cancer-Associated Intermediate Conductance CaCancers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSickle cell disease is an inherited disorder of hemoglobin, resulting in abnormal red blood cells. These are rigid and may block blood vessels leading to acute painful crises and other complications. Recent research has focused on therapies to rehydrate the sickled cells by reducing the loss of water and ions from them. Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of such drugs. This is an updated version of a previously published review.
objectivesTo assess the relative risks and benefits of drugs to rehydrate sickled red blood cells. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register. We also searched online trials registries for any ongoing trials (01 July 2018).Last search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 08 October 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of drugs to rehydrate sickled red blood cells compared to placebo or an alternative treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsOf the 51 studies identified, three met the inclusion criteria, including 524 people with sickle cell disease aged between 12 and 65 years of age. One study tested the effectiveness of zinc sulphate as compared to placebo and the remaining two assessed senicapoc versus placebo. No deaths were seen in any of the studies (low-quality evidence). The zinc sulphate study showed a significant reduction in painful crises (in a total of 145 participants) over one and a half years, mean difference -2.83 (95% confidence interval -3.51 to -2.15) (moderate-quality evidence). However, analysis was restricted due to limited statistical data. Changes to red blood cell parameters and blood counts were inconsistent (very low-quality evidence). No serious adverse events were noted in the study. The Phase II dose-finding study of senicapoc (a Gardos channel blocker) compared to placebo showed that the high dose senicapoc showed significant improvement in change in hemoglobin level, the number and proportion of dense red blood cells, red blood cell count and indices and hematocrit value (very low-quality evidence). The results with low-dose senicapoc were similar to the high-dose senicapoc group but of lesser magnitude. There was no difference in the frequency of painful crises between the three groups (low-quality evidence). A subsequent Phase III study of senicapoc was terminated early since there was no difference observed between the treatment and control groups in the primary end point of painful crises. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWhile the results of zinc for reducing sickle-related crises are encouraging, larger and longer-term multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this therapy for people with sickle cell disease.While the Phase II and the prematurely terminated phase III studies of senicapoc showed that the drug improved red blood cell survival (depending on dose), this did not lead to fewer painful crises.Given this is no longer an active area of research, this review will no longer be regularly updated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.