Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338484›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2019

MAOA-VNTR Genotype Effects on Ventral Striatum-Hippocampus Network in Alzheimer's Disease: Analysis Using Structural Covariance Network and Correlation with Neurobehavior Performance.

Hsin-I Chang, Ya-Ting Chang, Shih-Jen Tsai, Chi-Wei Huang, Shih-Wei Hsu, Mu-En Liu, Wen-Neng Chang, Chia-Yi Lien, Shu-Hua Huang, Chen-Chang Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cells · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hsin-I ChangDepartment of General Neurology, Cognitive and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County, 833, Taiwan.
Ya-Ting ChangDepartment of General Neurology, Cognitive and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County, 833, Taiwan.
Shih-Jen TsaiPsychiatric Department of Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Wei HuangDepartment of General Neurology, Cognitive and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County, 833, Taiwan.
Shih-Wei HsuDepartment of Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Mu-En LiuPsychiatric Division, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Neng ChangDepartment of General Neurology, Cognitive and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County, 833, Taiwan.
Chia-Yi LienDepartment of General Neurology, Cognitive and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County, 833, Taiwan.
Shu-Hua HuangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chen-Chang LeeDepartment of Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chiung-Chih ChangDepartment of General Neurology, Cognitive and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County, 833, Taiwan. neur099@adm.cgmh.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4931-0128
Chang Gung University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TW

Funding

Chang Gung Medical Foundation CMRPG8C0571, CMRPG8D0771 and CMRPG8E0541National Science Council 104-2314-B-182A-026-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene are associated with brain MAOA activity and transcriptional efficiency in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study investigated structural covariance networks mediated by MAOA-variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) genotypes in patients with AD, and assessed whether this effect was associated with sex. A total of 193 patients with AD were classified into four genotype groups based on MAOA transcriptional efficiency (female low [L], low-high + high activity groups [LH + H]; male L, male H groups). Structural covariance networks were constructed focusing on triple-network and striatal networks. Covariance strength was analyzed in the four groups, and the genotype and sex main effects and their interactions were analyzed. Significant peak cluster volumes were correlated with neurobehavioral scores to establish the clinical significance. MAOA genotypes mediated the structural covariance strength on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC)-caudate axis in both sexes, but a higher covariance strength was shown in the female L group and male H group. The independent effect of male sex was related to higher covariance strength in the frontal medial superior region in the dLPFC, dorsal caudate (DC), and ventral superior striatum (VSs) seeds. In contrast, female sex had higher covariance strength in the frontal opercular areas anchored by the dLPFC, DC, and VSs seeds. Topographies showing higher covariance strength with sex interactions were found in the male H group and female L group in the dLPFC supplementary motor axis, DC-SMA, and DC-precentral axis. In our patients with AD, MAOA-VNTR polymorphisms and sex had independent and interactive effects on structural covariance networks, of which the dLPFC-, VSs-, and DC-anchored networks represented major endophenotypes that determined cognitive outcomes. The sex-genotype interaction model suggested that male high activity and female low activity may modulate brain morphometric connectivity and determine cognitive scores.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAgedAlzheimer DiseaseBehaviorCognitionFemaleGenotypeHippocampusHumansMaleMinisatellite RepeatsMonoamine OxidaseVentral StriatumMonoamine OxidaseAlzheimer’s diseaseCaudate nucleusDorsolateral prefrontal cortexGenetic effectMonoamine oxidase AStriatal networkStructural covarianceVariable number tandem repeats

Identifiers

PMID30338484
OpenAlexW2897374635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.