ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019
Effect on VA Patient Satisfaction of Provider's Use of an Integrated Viewer of Multiple Electronic Health Records.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Service Quality Assessment of Digital Health Solutions in Outpatient Care: Qualitative Item Repository Development Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Impact of Electronic Health Services on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with Online Patient Portal Utilization Experience in an Arkansas Phone Survey.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Article
- Molecular-Guided Off-Label Targeted Therapy in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
- Mutational profiles of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas based upon human papillomavirus status in the Veterans Affairs National Precision Oncology Program.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Opportunities to use electronic health record audit logs to improve cancer care.Cancer medicine · 2022Review
- The impact of interprofessional communication through ICT on health outcomes of older adults receiving home care in Japan - A retrospective cohort study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2022Article
- Integrated Health Record Viewers and Reduction in Duplicate Medical Imaging: Retrospective Observational Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Variants and Outcomes Among Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors.JCO precision oncology · 2022Article
- Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Patient Portal Functionalities and Uptake: Systematic Review Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- The Relationship Between Follow-up Appointments and Access to Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Whose System is it Anyway? How Clients and Providers Evaluate the Impact of Session EHR Use on Communication in Mental Health Treatment.Community mental health journal · 2020Article
- One-Way and Round-Trip Analysis Demonstrates Surprising Limitations of Standards-Based Terminology Maps.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine associations between patient perceptions that their provider was knowledgeable of their medical history and clinicians' early adoption of an application that presents providers with an integrated longitudinal view of a patient's electronic health records (EHR) from multiple healthcare systems.
methodThis retrospective analysis utilizes provider audit logs from the Veterans Health Administration Joint Legacy Viewer (JLV) and patient responses to the Survey of Patient Healthcare Experiences Patient-Centered Medical Home (SHEP/PCMH) patient satisfaction survey (FY2016) to assess the relationship between the primary care provider being an early adopter of JLV and patient perception of the provider's knowledge of their medical history. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to control for patient age, race, sex education, health status, duration of patient-provider relationship, and provider characteristics.
resultsThe study used responses from 203,903 patients to the SHEP-PCMH survey in FY2016 who received outpatient primary care services from 11,421 unique providers. Most (91%) clinicians had no JLV utilization in the 6 months prior to the studied patient visit. Controlling for patient demographics, length of the patient-provider relationship, and provider and facility characteristics, being an early adopter of the JLV system was associated with a 14% (adj OR 1.14, p < 0.000) increased odds that patients felt their provider was knowledgeable about their medical history. When evaluating the interaction between duration of patient-provider relationship and being an early adopter of JLV, a greater effect was seen with patient-provider relationships that were greater than 3 years (adj OR 1.23, p < 0.000), compared to those less than 3 years.
conclusionsIncreasing the interoperability of medical information systems has the potential to improve both patient care and patient experience of care. This study demonstrates that early adopters of an integrated view of electronic health records from multiple delivery systems are more likely to have their patients report that their clinician was knowledgeable of their medical history. With provider payments often linked to patient satisfaction performance metrics, investments in interoperability may be worthwhile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.