ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2018
Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Laboratory Workup in the Context of New Concepts and Classification Criteria.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel spontaneous myelodysplastic syndrome mouse model.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review provides a comprehensive update of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and their diagnostic criteria, with emphasis on novel concepts and state-of-the-art laboratory workup, including multiparameter/multicolor flow cytometry, chromosome analysis, and mutation profiling. RECENT
findingsRecent advances in genetics and molecular technologies have provided unprecedented insights into the pathogenic mechanisms and genomic landscape of MDS and its precursor lesions. This has resulted in revised diagnostic criteria in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and proposed new terminology for early lesions such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). Against this landscape, a thorough understanding of the advantages and limitations of laboratory tests employed in the evaluation of patients with cytopenia has gained unprecedented importance. Healthcare providers involved in the care of patients with hematologic diseases should be aware of the intricacies of laboratory workup of such patients, particularly in view of the novel concepts and classification criteria of MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30338456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.