Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338374›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018

Quantitative perfusion assessment of intestinal anastomoses in pigs treated with glucagon-like peptide 2.

Nikolaj Nerup, Linea Landgrebe Ring, Rune Broni Strandby, Charlotte Egeland, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen, Jane Preuss Hasselby, Gro Linno Willemoe, Bolette Hartmann, Lars Bo Svendsen, Michael Patrick Achiam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaj NerupDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. nikolajnerup@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-2925
Linea Landgrebe RingDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Rune Broni StrandbyDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Charlotte EgelandDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Morten Bo Søndergaard SvendsenCopenhagen Academy of Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Jane Preuss HasselbyDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gro Linno WillemoeDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bolette HartmannSection for Translational Metabolic Physiology, Faculty of Health, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Bo SvendsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Michael Patrick AchiamDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite exhaustive research and improvement of techniques, anastomotic leakage remains a frequent complication in gastrointestinal surgery. As leakage is associated with poor perfusion, reliable objective methods to assess anastomotic perfusion are highly demanded. In addition, such methods enable evaluation of interventions that may improve anastomotic perfusion. Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) is an enteroendocrine hormone that regulates mid-gut perfusion. In the present study, we aimed to explore if quantitative perfusion assessment with indocyanine green (q-ICG) could detect an increase in porcine anastomotic perfusion after treatment with GLP-2.

methodsNineteen pigs had two small bowel resections followed by anastomosis. Blinded to all investigators, animals were randomized to receive GLP-2 or placebo. Anastomotic perfusion was assessed at baseline, 30 min after injection of GLP-2/placebo, and after 5 days of treatment. Anastomotic strength and healing were evaluated by bursting pressure and histology.

resultsQ-ICG detected a significantly higher increase in anastomotic perfusion (p < 0.05) in animals treated with GLP-2, compared with placebo. No significant differences in anastomotic strength or healing were found.

conclusionsQ-ICG is a promising tool for perfusion assessment in gastrointestinal surgery and opens new opportunities in research of factors that may influence anastomotic healing, but further research is warranted to evaluate the effects of GLP-2 on anastomotic healing.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakAnimalsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDisease Models, AnimalFluorescein AngiographyGlucagon-Like Peptide 2Intestine, SmallPerfusionRandom AllocationReference ValuesRegional Blood FlowStatistics, NonparametricSwineTreatment OutcomeGlucagon-Like Peptide 2Anastomotic leakageFluorescence angiographyGlucagon-like peptide-2Image-guided surgeryIndocyanine greenPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID30338374
OpenAlexW2896679723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.