Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338370›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes.

Emily R W Davidson, Tonya N Thomas, Erika J Lampert, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Cecile A Ferrando

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It.International urogynecology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily R W DavidsonCenter for Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. davidse3@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2842-748X
Tonya N ThomasCenter for Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Erika J LampertCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western University, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Marie Fidela R ParaisoCenter for Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cecile A FerrandoCenter for Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisHysterectomy can be performed during sacrocolpopexy, but there are limited studies comparing the effect of route of hysterectomy on adverse events. We hypothesized there would be no difference in adverse events or patient-reported outcomes in women who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with either vaginal or supracervical hysterectomy.

methodsThis was a retrospective chart review with a cross-sectional survey component sent to all consenting patients. Patients were identified by procedure code for sacrocolpopexy and hysterectomy from January 2005 to June 2016.

resultsOf the 161 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria, 116 underwent supracervical and 45 vaginal hysterectomy. Overall incidence of perioperative adverse events was low. Vaginal hysterectomy cases were faster (276 vs. 324 min, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of postoperative stress incontinence (22 vs. 9%, p = 0.03). Thirty-one (19%) of all subjects had recurrent prolapse; 10 (6%) underwent repeat surgery. Three (1%) subjects had a mesh exposure (no difference between groups), all treated conservatively. Ninety-six (60%) subjects responded to the survey with a median follow-up of 56 (9-134) months. Ninety-one percent (87) of respondents reported being better since surgery, and 91% (87) reported they would choose the surgery again. Twenty-eight percent (27) reported a surgery-related complication including pain, urinary and bowel symptoms; 8% (8) reported evaluation for recurrent prolapse symptoms, all treated conservatively; 4% (4) of respondents reported a mesh exposure.

conclusionsIncidence of adverse events is low and not different between patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with concurrent supracervical or vaginal hysterectomy. One in three patients report pelvic floor symptoms postoperatively, but long-term satisfaction is high.

Indexed as

Hysterectomy, VaginalAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceReoperationRetrospective StudiesSacrumSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeMinimally invasive hysterectomyPatient-reported outcomesProlapseSacrocolpopexyVaginal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID30338370
OpenAlexW2897942709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.