Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338342›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2018

Craving espresso: the dialetics in classifying caffeine as an abuse drug.

Max Kenedy Felix Dos Santos, Elaine C Gavioli, Lorena Santa Rosa, Vanessa de Paula Soares-Rachetti, Bruno Lobão-Soares

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Max Kenedy Felix Dos SantosDepartamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000 Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil.
Elaine C GavioliDepartamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000 Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil.
Lorena Santa RosaDepartamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000 Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil.
Vanessa de Paula Soares-RachettiDepartamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000 Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil.
Bruno Lobão-SoaresDepartamento de Biofísica e Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000 Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil. brunolobaosoares@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4564-2288
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine is the most consumed psychoactive substance in the world; in general, it is not associated to potentially harmful effects. Nevertheless, few studies were performed attempting to investigate the caffeine addiction. The present review was mainly aimed to answer the following question: is caffeine an abuse drug? To adress this point, the effects of caffeine in preclinical and clinical studies were summarized and critically analyzed taking account the abuse disorders described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). We concluded that the diagnostic criteria evidenced on DSM-V to intoxication-continued use and abstinence are not well supported by clinical studies. The fact that diagnostic criteria is not widely supported by preclinical or clinical studies may be due specially to a controversy in its exactly mechanism of action: recent literature point to an indirect, rather than direct modulation of dopamine receptors, and auto-limitant consumption due to adverse sensations in high doses. On the other hand, it reports clear withdrawal-related symptoms. Thus, based on a classical action on reward system, caffeine only partially fits its mechanism of action as an abuse drug, especially because previous research does not report a clear effect of dopaminergic activity enhance on nucleus accumbens; despite this, there are reports concerning dopaminergic modulation by caffeine on the striatum. However, based on human and animal research, caffeine withdrawal evokes signals and symptoms, which are relevant enough to include this substance among the drugs of abuse.

Indexed as

CaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsIllicit DrugsAdenosineAnimalsCravingDopamineHumansAdenosineCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineIllicit DrugsAbuse DrugAdenosineCaffeineDSM-VSubstance-related disordersWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID30338342
OpenAlexW2896544008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.