Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338174›Full record

ReviewCureus2018

Integrative Medicine as a Vital Component of Patient Care.

Richard Gannotta, Shaista Malik, Alvin Y Chan, Kamran Urgun, Frank Hsu, Sumeet Vadera

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integrative medicine utilization among infertility patients.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard GannottaChief Executive Officer, University of California, Irvine, Orange, USA.
Shaista MalikIntegrative Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA.
Alvin Y ChanNeurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, USA.
Kamran UrgunNeurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, USA.
Frank HsuNeurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, USA.
Sumeet VaderaNeurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, USA.

Funding

SBHW-PREDICT (The role of PRoteomics, gEnetics, and Directed Imaging using CT)R01HL128801 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MALIK, SHAISTA · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landscape of medicine in the United States has been slowly progressing toward a more holistic and individualized approach to healing. Part of this progress has been the integration between western and alternative forms of medicine, a concept that has been described as "integrative medicine." This approach to healthcare incorporates a patient's mind, spirituality, and sense of community into the healing process. Integrative medicine has been typically well received and the demand has been steadily increasing in primary US hospitals. Here we cover a number of topics that include the definition of integrative medicine, its potential benefits, current examples of successful implementations, and potential barriers to its expansion. The aim was to give a primary on integrative medicine and its current state for healthcare providers.

Indexed as

alternative and complementary medicinealternative medicine

Identifiers

PMID30338174
PMCPMC6173273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.