Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338170›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2018

The Impact of Hurricane Sandy on HIV Testing Rates: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis, January 1, 2011‒December 31, 2013.

Linda I Ekperi, Erin Thomas, Tanya Telfair LeBlanc, Erica Elaine Adams, Grete E Wilt, Noelle-Angelique Molinari, Eric G Carbone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Outreach Method Predicts Patient Re-engagement in Diabetes Care During Sustained Care Disruption.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Article
  5. Perspectives on the Health Effects of Hurricanes: A Review and Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda I EkperiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Applied Science and Evaluation Branch (ASEB), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Erin ThomasCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Office of the Director, Office of Science and Public Health Practice (OSPHP), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tanya Telfair LeBlancCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Applied Science and Evaluation Branch (ASEB), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Erica Elaine AdamsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Director, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Grete E WiltCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Director, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Noelle-Angelique MolinariCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Applied Science and Evaluation Branch (ASEB), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Eric G CarboneCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Office of the Director, Office of Science and Public Health Practice (OSPHP), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Office of Readiness and Response · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHurricane Sandy made landfall on the eastern coast of the United States on October 29, 2012 resulting in 117 deaths and 71.4 billion dollars in damage. Persons with undiagnosed HIV infection might experience delays in diagnosis testing, status confirmation, or access to care due to service disruption in storm-affected areas. The objective of this study is to describe the impact of Hurricane Sandy on HIV testing rates in affected areas and estimate the magnitude and duration of disruption in HIV testing associated with storm damage intensity.

methodsUsing MarketScan data from January 2011‒December 2013, this study examined weekly time series of HIV testing rates among privately insured enrollees not previously diagnosed with HIV; 95 weeks pre- and 58 weeks post-storm. Interrupted time series (ITS) analyses were estimated by storm impact rank (using FEMA's Final Impact Rank mapped to Core Based Statistical Areas) to determine the extent that Hurricane Sandy affected weekly rates of HIV testing immediately and the duration of that effect after the storm.

resultsHIV testing rates declined significantly across storm impact rank areas. The mean decline in rates detected ranged between -5% (95% CI: -9.3, -1.5) in low impact areas and -24% (95% CI: -28.5, -18.9) in very high impact areas. We estimated at least 9,736 (95% CI: 7,540, 11,925) testing opportunities were missed among privately insured persons following Hurricane Sandy. Testing rates returned to baseline in low impact areas by 6 weeks post event (December 9, 2012); by 15 weeks post event (February 10, 2013) in moderate impact areas; and by 17 weeks after the event (February 24, 2013) in high and very high impact areas.

conclusionsHurricane Sandy resulted in a detectable and immediate decline in HIV testing rates across storm-affected areas. Greater storm damage was associated with greater magnitude and duration of testing disruption. Disruption of basic health services, like HIV testing and treatment, following large natural and man-made disasters is a public health concern.  Disruption in testing services availability for any length of time is detrimental to the efforts of the current HIV prevention model, where status confirmation is essential to control disease spread.

Identifiers

PMID30338170
PMCPMC6160290
OpenAlexW2891262806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.