Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30338094›Full record

ArticleNursing open2018

Acute care nurses' perceptions of electronic health record use: A mixed method study.

Gillian Strudwick, Linda McGillis Hall, Lynn Nagle, Patricia Trbovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gillian StrudwickCentre for Addiction and Mental Health Toronto ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-7372
Linda McGillis HallLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
Lynn NagleLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
Patricia TrbovichInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe overall aim of this study is to examine nurses' perceptions of electronic health record use in an acute care hospital setting.

designThis study uses a sequential mixed methods design in two phases.

methodsPhase one consists of a survey of Registered Nurses to understand nurses' perceptions of electronic health record use. Phase two is comprised of focus groups of a subsample from phase one. Data collection occurred from November 2015 - August 2016 and was done in Toronto, Canada.

resultsIn phase one, navigation was found to be a predictor of nurses' perceptions of electronic health record use. In phase two, participants discussed the following five topics: (1) navigation; (2) functionality; (3) organizational standards; (4) documentation workload and (5) issues of system performance and response time. This study has implications for organizations implementing electronic health records, nursing leaders and electronic health record vendors.

Indexed as

acute carehealth services researchinformation technologymedical nursingsurgical nursing

Identifiers

PMID30338094
PMCPMC6178306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.