ArticleStandards in genomic sciences2018
First genome sequencing and comparative analyses of
Article in Standards in genomic sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Characterization and Pathogenicity Island Analysis of 17 Mexican Isolates ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Virulence and mutations analysis based on the whole genome of a BrazilianFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Infection by a multidrug-resistant Corynebacterium diphtheriae strain: prediction of virulence factors, CRISPR-Cas system analysis, and structural implications of mutations conferring rifampin resistance.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Article
- Resequencing and characterization of the firstPeerJ · 2024Article
- Bioinformatic Approach of B and T Cell Epitopes of PLD and CP40 Proteins ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Novel configurations of type I-E CRISPR-Cas system in Corynebacterium striatum clinical isolates.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- Isolation, characterization, and pathogenicity assessment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Bacteriological, cytological, and molecular investigation of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, mycobacteria, and other bacteria in caseous lymphadenitis and healthy lymph nodes of slaughtered sheep.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- Microbial Communities of Meat and Meat Products: An Exploratory Analysis of the Product Quality and Safety at Selected Enterprises in South Africa.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- CoryneRegNet 7, the reference database and analysis platform for corynebacterial gene regulatory networks.Scientific data · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.