Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30337949›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2018

Cowpea and abiotic stresses: identification of reference genes for transcriptional profiling by qPCR.

Lidiane Lindinalva Barbosa Amorim, José Ribamar Costa Ferreira-Neto, João Pacífico Bezerra-Neto, Valesca Pandolfi, Flávia Tadeu de Araújo, Mitalle Karen da Silva Matos, Mauro Guida Santos, Ederson Akio Kido, Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Assays inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cowpea (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Contrast Relative Humidity Response of Diverse Cowpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Content of Anthocyanins in Cowpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Cowpea Constraints and Breeding in Europe.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lidiane Lindinalva Barbosa Amorim *Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí, Oeiras, Piauí Brazil.
José Ribamar Costa Ferreira-Neto *2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
João Pacífico Bezerra-Neto2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Valesca Pandolfi2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Flávia Tadeu de Araújo2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Mitalle Karen da Silva Matos2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Mauro Guida Santos3Botany Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Ederson Akio Kido2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon2Genetics Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRInstituto Federal do Piauí · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to cowpea ability to fix nitrogen in poor soils and relative tolerance to drought and salt stresses, efforts have been directed to identifying genes and pathways that confer stress tolerance in this species. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) has been widely used as the most reliable method to measure gene expression, due to its high accuracy and specificity. In the present study, nine candidate reference genes were rigorously tested for their application in normalization of qPCR data onto roots of four distinct cowpea accessions under two abiotic stresses: root dehydration and salt (NaCl, 100 mM). In addition, the regulation of four target transcripts, under the same referred conditions was also scrutinized.

resultsgeNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and ΔCt method results indicated a set of three statistically validated RGs for each stress condition: (I) root dehydration (actin, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 variant 1D, and a

conclusionsReference genes suitable for qPCR analyses in cowpea under root dehydration and salt stress were identified. This action will lead to a more accurate and reliable analysis of gene expression on this species. Additionally, the results obtained in this study may guide future research on gene expression in cowpea under other abiotic stress types that impose osmotic imbalance. The target genes analyzed, in turn, deserve functional evaluation due to their transcriptional regulation under stresses and biotechnological potential.

Indexed as

DroughtHousekeeping genesLegumePhenylpropanoidsRoot tissueSalt stress

Identifiers

PMID30337949
PMCPMC6182843
OpenAlexW2897455690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.