Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30337861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2018

Audiovisual Integration Enhances Stimulus Detection Performance in Mice.

Guido T Meijer, Jean L Pie, Thomas L Dolman, Cyriel M A Pennartz, Carien S Lansink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Direct Piriform-to-Auditory Cortical Projections Shape Auditory-Olfactory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sound Improves Neuronal Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Approaches to Understanding Multisensory Dysfunction in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. The Visual Cortex in Context.Annual review of vision science · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guido T MeijerSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Center for Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jean L PieSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Center for Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Thomas L DolmanSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Center for Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cyriel M A PennartzSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Center for Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Carien S LansinkSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Center for Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of objects in the external world improves when humans and animals integrate object features of multiple sensory modalities. Behavioral and neuronal mechanisms underlying multisensory stimulus detection are poorly understood, mainly because they have not been investigated with suitable behavioral paradigms. Such behavioral paradigms should (i) elicit a robust multisensory gain, (ii) incorporate systematic calibration of stimulus amplitude to the sensory capacities of the individual subject, (iii) yield a high trial count, and (iv) be easily compatible with a large variety of neurophysiological recording techniques. We developed an audiovisual stimulus detection task for head-fixed mice which meets all of these critical behavioral constraints. Behavioral data obtained with this task indicated a robust increase in detection performance of multisensory stimuli compared with unisensory cues, which was maximal when both stimulus constituents were presented at threshold intensity. The multisensory behavioral effect was associated with a change in the perceptual performance which consisted of two components. First, the visual and auditory perceptual systems increased their sensitivity meaning that low intensity stimuli were more often detected. Second, enhanced acuity enabled the systems to better classify whether there was a stimulus or not. Fitting our data to signal detection models revealed that the multisensory gain was more likely to be achieved by integration of sensory signals rather than by stimulus redundancy or competition. This validated behavioral paradigm can be exploited to reliably investigate the neuronal correlates of multisensory stimulus detection at the level of single neurons, microcircuits, and larger perceptual systems.

Indexed as

auditorybehaviorcross-modalcue-integrationmultisensoryperceptionsensory

Identifiers

PMID30337861
PMCPMC6180166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.