Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30337837›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2018

Single nucleotide polymorphisms and sporadic colorectal cancer susceptibility: a field synopsis and meta-analysis.

Jing Wen, Qian Xu, Yuan Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening: From One-Size-FITs-All to Tailor-Made.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer prevention and diagnosis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen-4 (In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing Wen1Tumor Etiology and Screening Department of Cancer Institute and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 NanjingBei Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning China.
Qian Xu1Tumor Etiology and Screening Department of Cancer Institute and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 NanjingBei Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning China.
Yuan Yuan1Tumor Etiology and Screening Department of Cancer Institute and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No.155 NanjingBei Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough mounting non-hereditary colorectal cancer (NHCRC) associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been observed, no field synopsis and meta-analysis has been conducted through systematically assessing cumulative evidence, during the past 5 years.

methodsWe retrieved the database via the PubMed, Web of Science and Embase gateways to identify publications concerning the associations between SNPs and risk of NHCRC, up to May 1st, 2017. To assess the finding credibility, cumulative evidence was graded based on the Venice criteria. Meta-analysis was also performed for three subgroups including ethnicity (Asian vs Caucasian), primary cancer site (colon vs rectum) and TNM stage (I II vs III IV). Then, we arranged those high quality SNPs into different regions according to their locations on genes to evaluate their functional roles on CRC development.

results5114 publications were collected and 1001 of them met our inclusion criteria, which totally included 1788 SNPs in 793 genes or distinct chromosomal loci. Totally, we performed 359 primary and subgroup meta-analyses for 160 SNPs in 96 distinct genes. By utilizing the Venice criteria, we identified 15 high quality SNPs with 25 high credibility significant associations. Furthermore, we artificially divided the high quality SNPs into different groups, based on their SNP loci (exon region, intron region, promoter region, downstream region, non-coding region and intergenic region).

conclusionWe have identified 15 high quality SNPs which may act as promising genetic biomarkers for clinical NHCRC susceptibility screening and explored their functional roles on the NHCRC development based on their locations on genes.

Indexed as

Field synopsisMeta-analysisNon-hereditary colorectal cancerSingle nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID30337837
PMCPMC6180373
OpenAlexW2896459611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.