ArticleProceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2017
A novel pathway analysis approach based on the unexplained disregulation of genes.
Article in Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- SEMtree: tree-based structure learning methods with structural equation models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- PSF toolkit: an R package for pathway curation and topology-aware analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- SEMgsa: topology-based pathway enrichment analysis with structural equation models.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- PAGER Web APP: An Interactive, Online Gene Set and Network Interpretation Tool for Functional Genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Pathway Analysis for Cancer Research and Precision Oncology Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- SourceSet: A graphical model approach to identify primary genes in perturbed biological pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- A network-based pathway-extending approach using DNA methylation and gene expression data to identify altered pathways.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A crucial step in the understanding of any phenotype is the correct identification of the signaling pathways that are significantly impacted in that phenotype. However, most current pathway analysis methods produce both false positives as well as false negatives in certain circumstances. We hypothesized that such incorrect results are due to the fact that the existing methods fail to distinguish between the primary dis-regulation of a given gene itself and the effects of signaling coming from upstream. Furthermore, a modern whole-genome experiment performed with a next-generation technology spends a great deal of effort to measure the entire set of 30,000-100,000 transcripts in the genome. This is followed by the selection of a few hundreds differentially expressed genes, step that literally discards more than 99% of the collected data. We also hypothesized that such a drastic filtering could discard many genes that play crucial roles in the phenotype. We propose a novel topology-based pathway analysis method that identifies significantly impacted pathways using the entire set of measurements, thus allowing the full use of the data provided by NGS techniques. The results obtained on 24 real data sets involving 12 different human diseases, as well as on 8 yeast knock-out data sets show that the proposed method yields significant improvements with respect to the state-of-the-art methods: SPIA, GSEA and GSA. AVAILABILITY: Primary dis-regulation analysis is implemented in R and included in ROntoTools Bioconductor package (versions ≥ 2.0.0). https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/ROntoTools.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.