Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30337673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Ionizing radiation induces transgenerational effects of DNA methylation in zebrafish.

Jorke H Kamstra, Selma Hurem, Leonardo Martin Martin, Leif C Lindeman, Juliette Legler, Deborah Oughton, Brit Salbu, Dag Anders Brede, Jan Ludvig Lyche, Peter Aleström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Curcumin's Radioprotective Effects on Zebrafish Embryos.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Radiation dose rate effects: what is new and what is needed?Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Population differences in Chinook salmon (Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Jorke H KamstraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0033, Oslo, Norway. jorke.kamstra@nmbu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-0229
Selma HuremFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0033, Oslo, Norway.
Leonardo Martin MartinFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0033, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-5458
Leif C LindemanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0033, Oslo, Norway.
Juliette LeglerInstitute for Environment, Health and Societies, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Deborah OughtonFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433, Ås, Norway.
Brit SalbuFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433, Ås, Norway.
Dag Anders BredeFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433, Ås, Norway.
Jan Ludvig LycheFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0033, Oslo, Norway.
Peter AleströmFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 0033, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation is known to cause DNA damage, yet the mechanisms underlying potential transgenerational effects of exposure have been scarcely studied. Previously, we observed effects in offspring of zebrafish exposed to gamma radiation during gametogenesis. Here, we hypothesize that these effects are accompanied by changes of DNA methylation possibly inherited by subsequent generations. We assessed DNA methylation in F1 embryos (5.5 hours post fertilization) with whole genome bisulfite sequencing following parental exposure to 8.7 mGy/h for 27 days and found 5658 differentially methylated regions (DMRs). DMRs were predominantly located at known regulatory regions, such as gene promoters and enhancers. Pathway analysis indicated the involvement of DMRs related to similar pathways found with gene expression analysis, such as development, apoptosis and cancers, which could be linked to previous observed developmental defects and genomic instability in the offspring. Follow up of 19 F1 DMRs in F2 and F3 embryos revealed persistent effects up to the F3 generation at 5 regions. These results indicate that ionizing radiation related effects in offspring can be linked to DNA methylation changes that partly can persist over generations. Monitoring DNA methylation could serve as a biomarker to provide an indication of ancestral exposures to ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationRadiation, IonizingAnimalsDNA DamageEmbryo, NonmammalianEpigenesis, GeneticGametogenesisGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomic InstabilityReproductionZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30337673
PMCPMC6193964
OpenAlexW2896699588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.