Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30337529›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Substantiating freedom from parasitic infection by combining transmission model predictions with disease surveys.

Edwin Michael, Morgan E Smith, Moses N Katabarwa, Edson Byamukama, Emily Griswold, Peace Habomugisha, Thomson Lakwo, Edridah Tukahebwa, Emmanuel S Miri, Abel Eigege and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Rigorous surveillance is necessary for high confidence in end-of-outbreak declarations for Ebola and other infectious diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Edwin MichaelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. emichael@nd.edu.
Morgan E SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Moses N KatabarwaEmory University and The Carter Center, One Copenhill, 453 Freedom Parkway, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA.
Edson ByamukamaThe Carter Center, Uganda, P.O. Box 12027, Kampala, Uganda.
Emily GriswoldEmory University and The Carter Center, One Copenhill, 453 Freedom Parkway, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA.
Peace HabomugishaThe Carter Center, Uganda, P.O. Box 12027, Kampala, Uganda.
Thomson LakwoVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, 15 Bombo Road, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda.
Edridah TukahebwaVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, 15 Bombo Road, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda.
Emmanuel S MiriThe Carter Center, Nigeria, 1 Jeka Kadima Street off Tudun Wada Ring Road, Jos, Nigeria.
Abel EigegeThe Carter Center, Nigeria, 1 Jeka Kadima Street off Tudun Wada Ring Road, Jos, Nigeria.
Evelyn NgigeFederal Ministry of Health, Federal Sceretariat, Garki-Abuja, Nigeria.
Thomas R UnnaschGlobal Health Infectious Disease Research, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 33620, Tampa, FL, USA.
Frank O RichardsEmory University and The Carter Center, One Copenhill, 453 Freedom Parkway, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA.

Funding

Community-directed vector control to enhance mass drug administration for onchocerciasis elimination in AfricaR01AI123245 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI UNNASCH, THOMAS R · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123245U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) RO1AI123245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stopping interventions is a critical decision for parasite elimination programmes. Quantifying the probability that elimination has occurred due to interventions can be facilitated by combining infection status information from parasitological surveys with extinction thresholds predicted by parasite transmission models. Here we demonstrate how the integrated use of these two pieces of information derived from infection monitoring data can be used to develop an analytic framework for guiding the making of defensible decisions to stop interventions. We present a computational tool to perform these probability calculations and demonstrate its practical utility for supporting intervention cessation decisions by applying the framework to infection data from programmes aiming to eliminate onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis in Uganda and Nigeria, respectively. We highlight a possible method for validating the results in the field, and discuss further refinements and extensions required to deploy this predictive tool for guiding decision making by programme managers.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesElephantiasis, FilarialHumansOnchocerciasisParasitic DiseasesSample SizeUganda

Identifiers

PMID30337529
PMCPMC6193962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.