Systematic Assessment of Multispectral Voxel-Based Morphometry in Previously MRI-Negative Focal Epilepsy.

background and purposeVoxel-based morphometry is widely used for detecting gray matter abnormalities in epilepsy. However, its performance with changing parameters, smoothing and statistical threshold, is debatable. More important, the potential yield of combining multiple MR imaging contrasts (multispectral voxel-based morphometry) is still unclear. Our aim was to objectify smoothing and statistical cutoffs and systematically compare the performance of multispectral voxel-based morphometry with existing T1 voxel-based morphometry in patients with focal epilepsy and previously negative MRI. MATERIALS AND

methods3D T1-, T2-, and T2-weighted FLAIR scans were acquired for 62 healthy volunteers and 13 patients with MR imaging negative for focal epilepsy on a Magnetom Skyra 3T scanner with an isotropic resolution of 0.9 mm

resultsWe found the best performance of T1 at 12 mm and a T-threshold (statistical cutoff) of 3.7 for gray matter concentration analysis. When we incorporated these parameters, after expert visual interpretation of concordant and discordant findings, we identified T1+FLAIR as the best model with a concordant rate of 46.2% and a concordant rate/discordant rate of 1.20 compared with T1 with 30.8% and 0.67, respectively. Visual interpretation of voxel-based morphometry findings decreased concordant rates from 38.5%-46.2% to 15.4%-46.2% and discordant rates from 53.8%-84.6% to 30.8%-46.2% and increased specificity across models from 33.9%-40.3% to 46.8%-54.8%.

conclusionsMultispectral voxel-based morphometry, especially T1+FLAIR, can yield superior results over single-channel T1 in focal epilepsy patients with a negative conventional MR imaging.