Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30337410›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2018

Realizing private and practical pharmacological collaboration.

Brian Hie, Hyunghoon Cho, Bonnie Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Collaborative privacy-preserving analysis of oncological data using multiparty homomorphic encryption.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Distribution-Invariant Differential Privacy.Journal of econometrics · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Contrastive learning in protein language space predicts interactions between drugs and protein targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A guide to machine learning for biologists.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian HieComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-8142
Hyunghoon ChoComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2713-0150
Bonnie BergerComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. bab@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-7228

Funding

Structure-Based Prediction of the InteractomeR01GM081871 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2008 to 2020
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although combining data from multiple entities could power life-saving breakthroughs, open sharing of pharmacological data is generally not viable because of data privacy and intellectual property concerns. To this end, we leverage modern cryptographic tools to introduce a computational protocol for securely training a predictive model of drug-target interactions (DTIs) on a pooled dataset that overcomes barriers to data sharing by provably ensuring the confidentiality of all underlying drugs, targets, and observed interactions. Our protocol runs within days on a real dataset of more than 1 million interactions and is more accurate than state-of-the-art DTI prediction methods. Using our protocol, we discover previously unidentified DTIs that we experimentally validated via targeted assays. Our work lays a foundation for more effective and cooperative biomedical research.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityDrug Delivery SystemsComputer SimulationDatabases, PharmaceuticalHumansInformation DisseminationPharmacology

Identifiers

PMID30337410
PMCPMC6519716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.