Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30336784›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2018

A model of access combining triage with initial management reduced waiting time for community outpatient services: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

Katherine E Harding, Sandra G Leggat, Jennifer J Watts, Bridie Kent, Luke Prendergast, Michelle Kotis, Mary O'Reilly, Leila Karimi, Annie K Lewis, David A Snowdon and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katherine E HardingEastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia. katherine.harding@easternhealth.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0207-7071
Sandra G LeggatLa Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Jennifer J WattsDeakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
Bridie KentUniversity of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
Luke PrendergastLa Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Michelle KotisVictorian Department of Health and Human Services, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Mary O'ReillyEastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
Leila KarimiLa Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Annie K LewisEastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
David A SnowdonEastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
Nicholas F TaylorEastern Health, Level 2/5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong waiting times are associated with public community outpatient health services. This trial aimed to determine if a new model of care based on evidence-based strategies that improved patient flow in two small pilot trials could be used to reduce waiting time across a variety of services. The key principle of the Specific Timely Appointments for Triage (STAT) model is that patients are booked directly into protected assessment appointments and triage is combined with initial management as an alternative to a waiting list and triage system.

methodsA stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted between October 2015 and March 2017, involving 3116 patients at eight sites across a major Australian metropolitan health network.

resultsThe intervention reduced waiting time to first appointment by 33.8% (IRR = 0.663, 95% CI 0.516 to 0.852, P = 0.001). Median waiting time decreased from a median of 42 days (IQR 19 to 86) in the control period to a median of 24 days (IQR 13 to 48) in the intervention period. A substantial reduction in variability was also noted. The model did not impact on most secondary outcomes, including time to second appointment, likelihood of discharge by 12 weeks and number of appointments provided, but was associated with a small increase in the rate of missed appointments.

conclusionsBroad-scale implementation of a model of access and triage that combined triage with initial management and actively managed the relationship between supply and demand achieved substantial reductions in waiting time without adversely impacting on other aspects of care. The reductions in waiting time are likely to have been driven, primarily, by substantial reductions for those patients previously considered low priority.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615001016527 registration date: 29/09/2015.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAmbulatory CareAppointments and SchedulesAustraliaFemaleHumansTriageAccessAppointments and schedulesCommunity healthOutpatientsWaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID30336784
PMCPMC6194740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.