Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30336579›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Influence of Implant Neck Design on Peri-Implant Tissue Dimensions: A Comparative Study in Dogs.

José Luis Calvo-Guirado, Raúl Jiménez-Soto, Carlos Pérez Albacete-Martínez, Manuel Fernández-Domínguez, Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke, José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José Luis Calvo-GuiradoFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia 30107, Spain. jlcalvo@ucam.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-2253
Raúl Jiménez-SotoFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia 30107, Spain. drjsoto@yahoo.com.
Carlos Pérez Albacete-MartínezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia 30107, Spain. cperezalbacete@ucam.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-5185
Manuel Fernández-DomínguezFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Implant Dentistry, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid Hospital Group, Madrid 28040, Spain. clinferfun@yahoo.es.
Sérgio Alexandre GehrkeBiotecnos Research Center, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay. sergio.gehrke@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-9101
José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de ValFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia 30107, Spain. jemate@ucam.edu.
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversidad San Pablo CEU · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vivo study assessed (hard and soft) peri-implant tissue remodeling around implants with micro-ring and open-thread neck designs placed in a dog model. Twenty histological sections corresponding to four different implant designs that were placed in America Foxhound dogs were obtained from previous studies. All the implants had been placed under identical conditions and were divided into four groups: Group A, micro-rings on implant neck plus 0.5 mm refined surface; Group B, micro-rings on implant neck; Group C, open-thread neck; and, Group D, double-spiral neck. Eight weeks after surgery, the integrated implants were removed and processed for histological examination. Crestal bone loss and bone-to-implant contact was greater for micro-ring necks than open-thread necks. Soft tissues showed significant differences on both buccal and lingual aspects, so that the distance from peri-implant mucosa to the apical portion of the barrier epithelium was smaller in the micro-ring groups. So, in spite of generating greater bone-to-implant contact, implants with micro rings produced more bone loss than open-thread implants. Moreover, the outcomes that were obtained IPX implants smooth neck design produced less bone loss in the cervical area, following by Facility implants when compared with the other open thread and microthreaded implant designs. Implant thread design can influence on bone remodeling in the cervical area, related to bundle bone preservation.

Indexed as

bone levelsdental implantsneck designsoft tissue dimensions

Identifiers

PMID30336579
PMCPMC6212799
OpenAlexW2896852622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.