Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30336568›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Validity and Reliability of a Short Diet Questionnaire to Estimate Dietary Intake in Older Adults in a Subsample of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Anne Gilsing, Alexandra J Mayhew, Hélène Payette, Bryna Shatenstein, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Krystle Amog, Christina Wolfson, Susan Kirkland, Lauren E Griffith, Parminder Raina

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A meta-analysis of the reproducibility of food frequency questionnaires in nutritional epidemiological studies.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anne GilsingDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. anne.gilsing@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Alexandra J MayhewDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. mayhewaj@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6700-9497
Hélène PayetteCentre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1J 3H5, Canada. Helene.Payette@USherbrooke.ca.
Bryna ShatensteinCentre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada. bryna.shatenstein@umontreal.ca.
Sharon I KirkpatrickSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. sharon.kirkpatrick@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-5975
Krystle AmogDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. krystle.amog@gmail.com.
Christina WolfsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada. christina.wolfson@mcgill.ca.
Susan KirklandDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. susan.kirkland@dal.ca.
Lauren E GriffithDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. griffith@mcmaster.ca.
Parminder RainaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. praina@mcmaster.ca.
Impact · CADalhousie University · CAInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research LSA 9447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed test-retest reliability and relative validity of the Short Diet Questionnaire (SDQ) and usability of an online 24 h recall among 232 participants (62 years ± 9.1; 49.6% female) from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Participants were asked to complete four 24 h dietary recalls (24HRs) using the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24-Canada-2014), two SDQ administrations (prior to recalls one and four), and the System Usability Scale (SUS) for ASA24. For the SDQ administrations, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ranged from 0.49 to 0.57 for nutrients and 0.35 to 0.72 for food groups. Mean intakes estimated from the SDQ were lower compared than those from the 24HRs. For nutrients, correlation coefficients were highest for fiber, calcium, and vitamin D (45⁻64 years: 0.59, 0.50, 0.51; >65 years: 0.29, 0.38, 0.49,

Indexed as

DietDiet SurveysFeeding BehaviorAgedAge FactorsCanadaEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansInternetLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedNutrientsReproducibility of ResultsNutrients24 h recalldietary assessmentreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID30336568
PMCPMC6213467
OpenAlexW2897856536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.