Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30335805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Machine learning to support social media empowered patients in cancer care and cancer treatment decisions.

Daswin De Silva, Weranja Ranasinghe, Tharindu Bandaragoda, Achini Adikari, Nishan Mills, Lahiru Iddamalgoda, Damminda Alahakoon, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Raj Persad, Evgeny Osipov and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient considerations of social media account management after death.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daswin De SilvaResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3878-5969
Weranja RanasingheResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Tharindu BandaragodaResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-3496
Achini AdikariResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5112-5063
Nishan MillsResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Lahiru IddamalgodaResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Damminda AlahakoonResearch Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Nathan LawrentschukAustin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8553-5618
Raj PersadNorth Bristol, NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Evgeny OsipovDepartment of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Richard GraySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9694-4206
Damien BoltonAustin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA primary variant of social media, online support groups (OSG) extend beyond the standard definition to incorporate a dimension of advice, support and guidance for patients. OSG are complementary, yet significant adjunct to patient journeys. Machine learning and natural language processing techniques can be applied to these large volumes of unstructured text discussions accumulated in OSG for intelligent extraction of patient-reported demographics, behaviours, decisions, treatment, side effects and expressions of emotions. New insights from the fusion and synthesis of such diverse patient-reported information, as expressed throughout the patient journey from diagnosis to treatment and recovery, can contribute towards informed decision-making on personalized healthcare delivery and the development of healthcare policy guidelines. METHODS AND

findingsWe have designed and developed an artificial intelligence based analytics framework using machine learning and natural language processing techniques for intelligent analysis and automated aggregation of patient information and interaction trajectories in online support groups. Alongside the social interactions aspect, patient behaviours, decisions, demographics, clinical factors, emotions, as subsequently expressed over time, are extracted and analysed. More specifically, we utilised this platform to investigate the impact of online social influences on the intimate decision scenario of selecting a treatment type, recovery after treatment, side effects and emotions expressed over time, using prostate cancer as a model. Results manifest the three major decision-making behaviours among patients, Paternalistic group, Autonomous group and Shared group. Furthermore, each group demonstrated diverse behaviours in post-decision discussions on clinical outcomes, advice and expressions of emotion during the twelve months following treatment. Over time, the transition of patients from information and emotional support seeking behaviours to providers of information and emotional support to other patients was also observed.

conclusionsFindings from this study are a rigorous indication of the expectations of social media empowered patients, their potential for individualised decision-making, clinical and emotional needs. The increasing popularity of OSG further confirms that it is timely for clinicians to consider patient voices as expressed in OSG. We have successfully demonstrated that the proposed platform can be utilised to investigate, analyse and derive actionable insights from patient-reported information on prostate cancer, in support of patient focused healthcare delivery. The platform can be extended and applied just as effectively to any other medical condition.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMachine LearningSelf-Help GroupsSocial MediaSocial SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity NetworksEmotionsHumansInformation DisseminationInternetMaleMiddle AgedPatient Participation

Identifiers

PMID30335805
PMCPMC6193663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.