ArticlePloS one2018
Effects of vegetation, terrain and soil layer depth on eight soil chemical properties and soil fertility based on hybrid methods at urban forest scale in a typical loess hilly region of China.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil Quality Assessment in Farmland of a Rapidly Industrializing Area in the Yangtze Delta, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the spatial mapping and fertility assessment of soil chemical properties (SCPs) are well studied in the Loess Plateau region of China at farmland scale, little is known about spatial mapping the SCPs and their fertility and their influence factors at urban forest scale. The objectives of this study were to (1) compare the performance of two spatial interpolation methods, Ordinary kriging (OK) and regression kriging (RK), and (2) explain the relationships of the vegetation, terrain, and soil layer depth between the eight SCPs and their fertility, and (3) find the limiting factors of soil comprehensive fertility in this study area? The Yan'an urban forest was taken as study case, used hybrid spatial interpolation methods based on OK and RK to mapping eight SCPs and the soil fertility in each soil layer (0-20 cm, 20-40 cm, and 40-60 cm) for 285 soil samples. The results indicated that RK outperformed OK for total nitrogen (TN), available potassium (AK), organic matter (OM) in 0-60 cm profile and available phosphorus (AP) in the 0-20 cm and 40-60 cm soil layers because RK considered the impact of terrain. The terrain factors, comprising the relative terrain position, slope, aspect, and relative elevation significantly affected the SCPs and spatial heterogeneity of fertility, where the vegetation cover types determined the average SCPs to some extent. On average, the six SCPs (except total potassium and AP) and the fertility decreased as the soil layer depth increased. Ten vegetation cover types comprising broadleaved mixed natural forest (BM), cultivated land (CL), economic forest (EF), grassland (GL), Platycladus orientalis natural forest (PON), Platycladus orientalis plantation (POP), Pinus tabuliformis plantation (PT), Quercus wutaishanica natural forest (QW), Robinia pseudoacacia plantation (RP), and Shrubwood (SW) were associated with significant differences in TN, OM, AN, AP, and AK, across the three soil layers. QW, PON, and BM also had higher content of TN, OM, AN, and AK contents than the other vegetation cover types. There were small differences in TK, AK, and pH among the 10 vegetation cover types. We concluded that AN, TN, and OM are the limiting factors of soil comprehensive fertility in this region. These results improve understanding of the spatial mapping, influence and limiting factors of SCPs and their fertility at urban forest scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.