Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30335758›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The estimated number of potential PrEP users among gay-identifying men who have sex with men in Australia.

Iryna B Zablotska, Richard Gray, Bill Whittaker, Martin Holt, Edwina Wright, Garrett Prestage, Darryl O'Donnell, Andrew E Grulich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iryna B ZablotskaFaculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-2197
Richard GrayThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2885-0483
Bill WhittakerNational Association of People with HIV, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Edwina WrightDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Garrett PrestageThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Darryl O'DonnellAustralian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew E GrulichThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the size of the population of gay-identified men who have sex with men (gay men) eligible for PrEP in Australia under the current national PrEP guidelines. Using input indicators from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the national representative survey Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships, and national HIV- behavioural surveillance, we calculated the size of the population of sexually active gay men and estimated a range for the number eligible for PrEP using different scenarios based on the guidelines. In 2015, an estimated 108,850 sexually-active 16-69-year-old gay men were classified as at risk of acquiring HIV in Australia. Of these men, 10,558 to 30,913 (9.7%-28.4%) were classified as being at high risk and therefore eligible for PrEP, most commonly due to recent receptive condomless intercourse with casual partners (6.1% to 15.5%), STI infections (5.4% to 10.6%) or the use of crystal methamphetamine (1.4% to 9.4%). The higher estimates included men who may have been at HIV risk for shorter time periods or with fewer partners. Australian PrEP guidelines recommend targeting PrEP to people at high HIV risk. Our estimation of potential PrEP users informed PrEP implementation in Australia. The choice of PrEP eligibility criteria, and interpretation of the guidelines, strongly affects the population estimates. In the future, higher numbers of gay men may become eligible for PrEP, because the estimates are largely defined by and follow trends in condomless anal intercourse. Our estimation methods can be adapted to other settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaEligibility DeterminationHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPopulation DensityPopulation SurveillancePractice Guidelines as TopicPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual PartnersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30335758
PMCPMC6193616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.