Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30335751›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Identification of UHRF2 as a novel DNA interstrand crosslink sensor protein.

Anna Motnenko, Chih-Chao Liang, Di Yang, David Lopez-Martinez, Yasunaga Yoshikawa, Bao Zhan, Katherine E Ward, Jiayang Tian, Wilhelm Haas, Paolo Spingardi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The UHRF protein family in epigenetics, development, and carcinogenesis.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna MotnenkoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chih-Chao LiangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5039-7008
Di YangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David Lopez-MartinezDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yasunaga YoshikawaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-3088
Bao ZhanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Katherine E WardDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jiayang TianDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Wilhelm HaasDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America Medicine, Kitasato University, Aomori, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8225-9099
Paolo SpingardiLudwig Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Benedikt M KesslerTarget Discovery Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-2446
Skirmantas KriaucionisLudwig Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Steven P GygiDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America Medicine, Kitasato University, Aomori, Japan.
Martin A CohnDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2988-3009
University of Oxford · GBHarvard University · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M001873/1Medical Research Council MR/N021002/1Wellcome Trust 090087/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 210640/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway is important for repairing interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) between the Watson-Crick strands of the DNA double helix. An initial and essential stage in the repair process is the detection of the ICL. Here, we report the identification of UHRF2, a paralogue of UHRF1, as an ICL sensor protein. UHRF2 is recruited to ICLs in the genome within seconds of their appearance. We show that UHRF2 cooperates with UHRF1, to ensure recruitment of FANCD2 to ICLs. A direct protein-protein interaction is formed between UHRF1 and UHRF2, and between either UHRF1 and UHRF2, and FANCD2. Importantly, we demonstrate that the essential monoubiquitination of FANCD2 is stimulated by UHRF1/UHRF2. The stimulation is mediating by a retention of FANCD2 on chromatin, allowing for its monoubiquitination by the FA core complex. Taken together, we uncover a mechanism of ICL sensing by UHRF2, leading to FANCD2 recruitment and retention at ICLs, in turn facilitating activation of FANCD2 by monoubiquitination.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsCell LineCell NucleusChromatinDNADNA DamageDNA RepairFanconi AnemiaFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsUbiquitinationCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsChromatinDNAFANCD2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUHRF1 protein, humanUHRF2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30335751
PMCPMC6193622
OpenAlexW2896689037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.