Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30335426›Full record

SynthesisJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2018

Anxiety sensitivity and suicidal ideation/suicide risk: A meta-analysis.

Ian H Stanley, Joseph W Boffa, Megan L Rogers, Melanie A Hom, Brian J Albanese, Carol Chu, Daniel W Capron, N Brad Schmidt, Thomas E Joiner

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ian H StanleyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.ORCID 0000-0001-5607-5763
Joseph W BoffaDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Megan L RogersDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Melanie A HomDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Brian J AlbaneseDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Carol ChuMcLean Hospital.
Daniel W CapronDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi.
N Brad SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Thomas E JoinerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.

Funding

Integrated Clinical Neuroscience Training for Translational ResearchT32MH093311 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA A ECKEL, Pamela K. Keel · 2012 to 2026
$2.3M
Military Suicide Research ConsortiumNIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuicide is a global public health concern. To inform the prevention and treatment of suicidality, it is crucial to identify transdiagnostic vulnerability factors for suicide and suicide-related conditions. One candidate factor is anxiety sensitivity (AS)-the fear of anxiety-related sensations-which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a host of mental health outcomes, including suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Importantly, AS is distinct from trait anxiety and negative affectivity, highlighting its potential incremental utility in the understanding of psychopathology. Despite a burgeoning body of literature demonstrating that AS is linked to suicidal thoughts and behaviors, this research has yet to be synthesized.

methodThis meta-analysis includes 33 articles representing 34 nonredundant samples (N = 14,002) that examined at least one relationship between AS global or subfactor (i.e., cognitive, physical, social) scores and suicidal ideation and/or suicide risk.

resultsFindings revealed small-to-moderate and moderate associations between global AS and suicidal ideation (r = .24, 95% confidence interval (CI): [.21, .26], p < .001) and suicide risk (r = .35, 95% CI [.31, .38], p < .001), respectively. All AS subfactors evinced significant associations with suicidal ideation (rs = .13-.24) and suicide risk (rs = .22-.32).

conclusionsAS is related to suicidal ideation and global suicide risk. Research is needed to disentangle AS from other indices of distress in the prediction of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

RiskSuicidal IdeationAdolescentAdultAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychopathologyRisk Reduction BehaviorSelf ConceptSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicideSuicide, Attempted

Identifiers

PMID30335426
PMCPMC6469498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.