Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334984›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Detection of uric acid crystal deposition by ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography: A cross-sectional study in patients with clinically diagnosed gout.

Yu Wang, Xuerong Deng, Yufeng Xu, Lanlan Ji, Zhuoli Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Ultrasound Features in Gout: An Overview.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Clinical characteristics of crystal deposits in joints and tendons in patients with gout].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Risk factors and diagnostic value for ultrasound-detected tendon monosodium urate crystal deposition in patients with gout].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. [Analysis of risk factors influencing the detection rate of urate crystal by dual energy computed tomography].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology.
Xuerong DengDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology.
Yufeng XuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Lanlan JiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology.
Zhuoli ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology.
Peking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare the performance of ultrasonography (US) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in detecting the crystal deposition at lower extremity joints in patients with gout. The correlation of imaging findings with microscopic findings was further assessed whenever aspiration is available.We recruited consecutive patients who were presented with arthritis of lower extremity from January 2012 to December 2014. All the patients underwent DECT and US scan of bilateral knees, ankles, and feet. Synovial fluid was obtained by aspiration from an acute inflammatory joint if possible.Finally, 60 patients fulfilling the 1977 gout classification criteria were included in our study. We found that US can detect significantly more patients with crystal deposition than DECT (81.7% vs 56.7%, by US and DECT, respectively, P < .001). The frequency of urate crystal deposition detected by US at MTP1, knee, and ankle joints regions was 56.7%, 63.3%, and 51.7%, respectively. The percentage of positivity of double contour sign on US was 33.3%, 48.3%, and 41.7% at the joints mentioned above, respectively. There was a good correlation between ultrasound and synovial fluid analysis in detecting crystal deposition (κ = 0.87, P = .001), while the agreement between DECT and synovial fluid analysis was just fair (κ = 0.28, P = .02).The sensitivity of US in detecting urate crystal deposition in lower extremity joints was higher than DECT. The superiority was more obvious in knee and MTP1 joints. US should be considered as the first choice of image examinations when diagnosing gout.

Indexed as

AgedAnkle JointArthritis, GoutyCross-Sectional StudiesCrystallizationFemaleFootHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedSynovial FluidTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyUric AcidUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID30334984
PMCPMC6211858
OpenAlexW2896974765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.