ArticleMedicine2018
Value of using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health for stroke rehabilitation assessment: A multicenter clinical study.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Revolutionizing Stroke Management with Wearable Technology: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Opportunities, Challenges, and the Future Path Towards Equitable Implementation.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- Content Analysis of Assessment Tools Used in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review with Linkage to the International Classification of Functioning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Neurological Health Conditions Using a Machine Learning Approach.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Disabling tinnitus and third nerve palsy following pontine hemorrhage: Application of ICF framework.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Effects of visual arts-based interventions on physical and psychosocial outcomes of people with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Review
- Profiling Daily Life Performance Recovery in the Early Subacute Phase After Stroke Using a Graphical Modeling Approach.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Development of a clinical tool for rating categories of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in Polish practice.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Goal-setting and personalization under the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework: Community reintegration program for post-stroke patients.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- COMIRESTROKE-A clinical study protocol for monitoring clinical effect and molecular biological readouts ofFrontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Analyzes of the ICF Domain of Activity After a Neurological Early Mobility Protocol in a Public Hospital in Brazil.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Combining Magnetization Transfer Ratio MRI and Quantitative Measures of Walking Improves the Identification of Fallers in MS.Brain sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in stroke rehabilitation assessment in China and to identify correlations between the ICF and several commonly used clinical assessment instruments for stroke.In total, 52 hospitals and 5 premier rehabilitation and neurology research centers participated in this cross-sectional multicenter clinical study. A total of 2822 stroke patients admitted to a neurology or rehabilitation department of a participating medical center between July 2012 and June 2014 were included. The ICF checklist contains 4 parts with 128 two-level items: body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors. We analyzed the results of ICF assessments and determined whether correlations existed between the various items of the ICF and several commonly used clinical assessment instruments.In all but 3 instances, the scores for the ICF-b-body function, ICF-s-body structure-degree of impairment, ICF-s-body structure-impairment location, ICF-d-activity performance, ICF-d-ability performance, ICF-e-facilitator, and ICF-e-barrier correlated significantly (P < .05) with the scores for the commonly used clinical assessment instruments.The ICF checklist is a new rehabilitation assessment instrument that is compatible with commonly used clinical assessment scales for stroke and can be used in combination with these scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.