Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334876›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2019

Third-Line Antiretroviral Therapy Program in the South African Public Sector: Cohort Description and Virological Outcomes.

Michelle Moorhouse, Gary Maartens, Willem Daniel Francois Venter, Mahomed-Yunus Moosa, Kim Steegen, Khadija Jamaloodien, Matthew P Fox, Francesca Conradie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle MoorhouseWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Gary MaartensDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Willem Daniel Francois VenterWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mahomed-Yunus MoosaDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Kim SteegenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Khadija JamaloodienNational Department of Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Matthew P FoxEpidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Francesca ConradieUniversity of Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends that antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs in resource-limited settings develop third-line ART policies. South Africa developed a national third-line ART program for patients who have failed both first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART and second-line protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART. We report on this program.

methodsThird-line ART in South Africa is accessed through a national committee that assesses eligibility and makes individual regimen recommendations. Criteria for third-line include the following: ≥1 year on PI-based ART with virologic failure, despite adherence optimization, and genotypic antiretroviral resistance test showing PI resistance. We describe baseline characteristics and resistance patterns of this cohort and present longitudinal data on virological suppression rates.

resultsBetween August 2013 and July 2014, 144 patients were approved for third-line ART. Median age was 41 years [interquartile range (IQR): 19-47]; 60% were women (N = 85). Median CD4 count and viral load were 172 (IQR: 128-351) and 14,759 (IQR: 314-90,378), respectively. About 2.8% started PI-based ART before 2004; 11.1% from 2004 to 2007; 31.3% from 2008 to 2011; and 6.3% from 2012 to 2014 (48.6% unknown start date). Of the 144 patients, 97% and 98% had resistance to lopinavir and atazanavir, respectively; 57% had resistance to darunavir. All were initiated on a regimen containing darunavir, with raltegravir in 101, and etravirine in 33. Among those with at least 1 viral load at least 6 months after third-line approval (n = 118), a large proportion (83%, n = 98) suppressed to <1000 copies per milliliter, and 79% (n = 93) to <400 copies per milliliter.

conclusionA high proportion of third-line patients with follow-up viral loads are virologically suppressed.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesDrug Resistance, ViralDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPublic SectorSouth AfricaViral LoadYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID30334876
PMCPMC6319697
OpenAlexW2896894134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.