Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334750›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019

Deep Geodesic Learning for Segmentation and Anatomical Landmarking.

Neslisah Torosdagli, Denise K Liberton, Payal Verma, Murat Sincan, Janice S Lee, Ulas Bagci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trueness of artificial intelligence-based, manual, and global thresholding segmentation protocols for human mandibles.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Application of Deep Learning on CBCT in Dentistry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neslisah Torosdagli
Denise K Liberton
Payal Verma
Murat Sincan
Janice S Lee
Ulas Bagci

Funding

Craniofacial Anomalies and RegenerationZIADE000746 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI LEE, JANICE · 2015 to 2025
$12.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DE999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DE000746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning framework for anatomy segmentation and automatic landmarking. Specifically, we focus on the challenging problem of mandible segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and identification of 9 anatomical landmarks of the mandible on the geodesic space. The overall approach employs three inter-related steps. In the first step, we propose a deep neural network architecture with carefully designed regularization, and network hyper-parameters to perform image segmentation without the need for data augmentation and complex post-processing refinement. In the second step, we formulate the landmark localization problem directly on the geodesic space for sparsely-spaced anatomical landmarks. In the third step, we utilize a long short-term memory network to identify the closely-spaced landmarks, which is rather difficult to obtain using other standard networks. The proposed fully automated method showed superior efficacy compared to the state-of-the-art mandible segmentation and landmarking approaches in craniofacial anomalies and diseased states. We used a very challenging CBCT data set of 50 patients with a high-degree of craniomaxillofacial variability that is realistic in clinical practice. The qualitative visual inspection was conducted for distinct CBCT scans from 250 patients with high anatomical variability. We have also shown the state-of-the-art performance in an independent data set from the MICCAI Head-Neck Challenge (2015).

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAnatomic LandmarksChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyCraniofacial AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMandibleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30334750
PMCPMC6475529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.