ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2018
Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and public involvement in HIV research: a mapping review and development of an online evidence map.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Pooled it
- The precarious state of community engagement in African clinical trials: A systematic review of funding, workforce gaps, and the path to institutionalization.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Through the lens of Good Participatory Practice: Findings and lessons learned from the healthcare worker subcommittee of the COVID-19 Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes Registry.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- The "3 Ps" of EmPowerment, Partnership and Protection - Stakeholder Perceptions of Beneficial Outcomes of Engagement in HIV Prevention Trials.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024Article
- Sexual and reproductive health research capacity strengthening programs in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Healthcare Provider Perspectives on HIV Cure Research in Ghana.AIDS research and treatment · 2023Article
- Youth engagement in HIV prevention intervention research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021Article
- Beyond clinical trials: social outcomes of structured stakeholder engagement in biomedical HIV prevention trials in China.Culture, health & sexuality · 2020Article
- Why ethics guidance needs to be updated for contemporary HIV prevention research.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020Review
- What lessons it might teach us? Community engagement in HIV research.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2020Review
- Lessons learned from engaging communities for Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone: reciprocity, relatability, relationships and respect (the four R's).BMC public health · 2019Article
- Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018Article
- It is not just about "the trial": the critical role of effective engagement and participatory practices for moving the HIV research field forward.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Good Participatory Practice (GPP): Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials, second edition (2011) were developed to provide clinical trial sponsors and implementers with a formal stakeholder engagement framework. As one of the largest African research institutes, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI) became an early adopter of GPP by implementing its principles within large-scale national and regional clinical trials. This article examines Wits RHI's lessons learned from implementing GPP, its ongoing efforts to institutionalize GPP, and the yet to be realized potential in creating fully sustainable structures for meaningful stakeholder engagement in HIV prevention research, implementation science and beyond. DISCUSSION: For the past seven years, Wits RHI has undertaken both centralized leadership roles in implementing GPP across multi-party regional research consortia as well as overseeing GPP for smaller investigator-driven trials. Through this iterative roll-out of GPP, key lessons have emerged. Obtaining upfront funding to support GPP activities throughout and between the research life cycle, and a trained multi-disciplinary team of GPP practitioners have helped facilitate an enabling environment for GPP implementation. We further recommend formally integrating stakeholder engagement into study documents, including monitoring and evaluation plans with indicators and performance metrics, to assist teams to track and refine their GPP strategies. Finally, institutionalizing resources and supporting organization-wide GPP along with ongoing support can help build efficiencies and maximize economies of scale toward a pragmatic and innovative application of the GPP Guidelines.
conclusionsThanks to a growing global network of GPP practitioners and a burgeoning GPP Community of Practice, there has been substantive progress in making GPP an integral component of clinical HIV prevention research. The Wits RHI experience highlights the possibilities and the challenges to translating the GPP principles into concrete practices within specific clinical trials and across a research institute. Realizing the full potential of GPP, including direct and indirect - 'collateral benefits' will require the collective buy-in and support from sponsors, implementers and community stakeholders across the research field. As the HIV prevention research field expands, however, a more conscious and systematic implementation of GPP is timely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.