Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334365›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2018

Developing an In Vitro Model to Screen Drugs for Nerve Regeneration.

Melissa L D Rayner, Simão Laranjeira, Rachael E Evans, Rebecca J Shipley, Jess Healy, James B Phillips

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vitro Models for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa L D RaynerBiomaterials & Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, WC1X 8LD, London, UK.
Simão LaranjeiraUCL Centre for Nerve Engineering, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Rachael E EvansBiomaterials & Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, WC1X 8LD, London, UK.
Rebecca J ShipleyUCL Centre for Nerve Engineering, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Jess HealyDepartment of Pharmacology, UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square WC1N 1AX, London, UK.
James B PhillipsBiomaterials & Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, WC1X 8LD, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8117-3074
Medway School of Pharmacy · GBNerve Centre · GB

Funding

EPSRC EP/L01646XEPSRC EP/N033493/1EPSRC EP/R004463/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) have a high prevalence and can be debilitating, resulting in life-long loss or disturbance in end-organ function, which compromises quality of life for patients. Current therapies use microsurgical approaches but there is the potential for enhancing recovery through other therapeutic modalities such as; cell-based conduits, gene therapy and small molecules. A number of molecular targets and drugs which have the potential to improve nerve regeneration have been identified, however, there are challenges associated with moving therapies toward clinical translation. Due to the lack of detailed knowledge about the pro-regenerative effect of potential drug treatments, there is a need for effective in vitro models to screen compounds to inform future pre-clinical and clinical studies. The interaction between regenerating neurites and supporting Schwann cells is a key feature of the nerve environment, therefore, in vitro models that mimic this cellular association are useful tools. In this study, we have investigated various cell culture models, including simple monolayer systems and more complex 3D-engineered co-cultures, as models for use in PNI drug development. Anat Rec, 301:1628-1637, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCoculture TechniquesDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGanglia, SpinalIbuprofenNerve RegenerationPC12 CellsPeripheral Nerve InjuriesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRats, WistarAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofendrug discoveryperipheral nerveregenerationtherapiestissue model

Identifiers

PMID30334365
PMCPMC6282521
OpenAlexW2896301483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.