ReviewJournal of religion and health2019
Assessing Spiritual Well-Being in Residential Aged Care: An Exploratory Review.
Review in Journal of religion and health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quo Vadis Gerotranscendence? A Systematic Literature Network Analysis of Existing Themes and Emerging Trends in Gerotranscendence Theory with a Focus on International Applications.Journal of religion and health · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life of people with cancer and their family caregivers.Nursing open · 2020Pooled it
- Spirituality in Professional Patient-Centered Care for Adults with Primary Brain Tumors: An Exploratory Scoping Review.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
- Religion, Spirituality and Health Research: Warning of Contaminated Scales.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- An Online Survey of Australian Medical Students' Perspectives on Spiritual History Taking and Spiritual Care.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- The Meaning and Role of Spirituality for Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.Journal of religion and health · 2022Article
- Spiritual Needs Assessment in Post-Secular Contexts: An Integrative Review of Questionnaires.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Valuing the Spiritual.Journal of religion and health · 2021Article
- Chaplaincy, Spiritual Care and Moral Injury: Considerations Regarding Screening and Treatment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the emerging incorporation of spiritual care into the allied health stream, there is a need for a clear and validated process of spiritual review that can be understood across multidisciplinary teams. The aim and purpose of this paper was to critically review the literature regarding spiritual screening, history-taking and assessment, and explore the merits of developing a brief instrument focussed on assessing and improving the spiritual well-being of consumers within residential aged care. Following an exploratory review of the literature, the results indicate that effective processes are noted regarding the triage and identification of the needs and spiritual assessment of consumers; however, many of these tools are overly religious in content, unwieldy in size, or not specifically aimed at identifying the immediate crisis confronting the consumer. It is recommended that an assessment instrument be developed which is communicable across all allied health practitioners (including spiritual carers), which may contribute towards a taxonomy of common consumer conditions, and which will enable the development and delivery of more targeted care plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30334185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.