Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334165›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2019

Incidence and predictors of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway.

Mohsen Alhashemi, Julio F Fiore, Nadia Safa, Mohammed Al Mahroos, Juan Mata, Nicolò Pecorelli, Gabriele Baldini, Nandini Dendukuri, Barry L Stein, A Sender Liberman and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohsen AlhashemiDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Julio F FioreDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Nadia SafaDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Mohammed Al MahroosDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Juan MataDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Nicolò PecorelliDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Gabriele BaldiniDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Nandini DendukuriDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre - Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Barry L SteinDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
A Sender LibermanDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Patrick CharleboisDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Franco CarliDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Liane S FeldmanDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. liane.feldman@mcgill.ca.
McGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is common after colorectal surgery but has not been widely studied in the context of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) that include interventions aimed to accelerate gastrointestinal recovery. The aim of this study is to estimate the incidence and predictors of PPOI in the context of an ERP for colorectal surgery.

methodsWe analyzed data from an institutional colorectal surgery ERP registry. Incidence of PPOI was estimated according to a definition adapted from Vather (intolerance of solid food and absence of flatus or bowel movement for ≥ 4 days) and compared to other definitions in the literature. Potential risk factors for PPOI were identified from previous studies, and their predictive ability was evaluated using Bayesian model averaging (BMA). Results are presented as posterior effect probability (PEP). Evidence of association was categorized as: no evidence (PEP < 50%), weak evidence (50-75%), positive evidence (75-95%), strong evidence (95-99%), and very strong evidence (> 99%).

resultsThere were 323 patients analyzed (mean age 63.5 years, 51% males, 74% laparoscopic, 33% rectal resection). The incidence of PPOI was 19% according to the primary definition, but varied between 11 and 59% when using other definitions. On BMA analysis, intraoperative blood loss (PEP 99%; very strong evidence), administration of any intravenous opioids in the first 48 h (PEP 94%; strong evidence), postoperative epidural analgesia (PEP 56%; weak evidence), and non-compliance with intra-operative fluid management protocols (3 ml/kg/h for laparoscopic and 5 ml/kg/h for open; PEP 55%, weak evidence) were predictors of PPOI.

conclusionsThe incidence of PPOI after colorectal surgery is high even within an established ERP and varied considerably by diagnostic criteria, highlighting the need for a consensus definition. The use of intravenous opioids is a modifiable strong predictor of PPOI within an ERP, while the role of epidural analgesia and intraoperative fluid management should be further evaluated.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysAgedAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesics, OpioidBayes TheoremBlood Loss, SurgicalColonic DiseasesDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIleusIncidenceLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidColorectalPostoperative ileusSurgery

Identifiers

PMID30334165
OpenAlexW2897199714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.