Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334150›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Training with biofeedback devices improves clinical outcome compared to usual care in patients with unilateral TKA: a systematic review.

Daniel Pfeufer, Jeremy Gililland, Wolfgang Böcker, Christian Kammerlander, Mike Anderson, Nicola Krähenbühl, Christopher Pelt

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A review of concurrent sonified biofeedback in balance and gait training.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel PfeuferDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. d.pfeufer@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-3316
Jeremy GilillandDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Wolfgang BöckerDepartment of Traumatology, Munich University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.
Christian KammerlanderDepartment of Traumatology, Munich University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.
Mike AndersonDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Nicola KrähenbühlDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Christopher PeltDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
University of Utah · USLMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE)/ Max Kade Foundation (US) PF 939/1-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiofeedback following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) seems to be a feasible approach to improve rehabilitation, outcomes, mobility and reduce pain. This systematic review gives the practicing orthopedic surgeon a summary of what is available and how biofeedback affects clinical outcomes.

methodsWe reviewed the current literature regarding methods, devices and effects of biofeedback in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 2018 for the following keywords: Biofeedback OR Feedback AND Total Knee Arthroplasty OR TKA. Data were extracted according to a predefined setting (see Protocol for systematic review on PROSPEO). Devices used for biofeedback were recorded. Demographics, training methods and effects were also collected.

resultsThe search resulted in 380 potentially eligible studies from which 11 met all inclusion criteria including 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 cohort studies, and 1 cross-sectional study. A total of 416 patients with unilateral TKA were included, with an average of 37.8 patients per study. In patients with TKA, significant improvements in activity scores or pain were reported by 9 of 11 studies. Only two of the studies reported no significant influence of the feedback on the chosen outcome parameters. Devices for biofeedback varied between studies and included the use of a goniometer, force plate, balance board, treadmill, and/or electromyography (EMG). The most common type of feedback was visual followed by audio, with one study mentioning that the audio mode was preferred by the patients as it was easier to handle. Overall, 5 out of 6 different methods demonstrated a potential value for improving mobility and decreasing pain.

conclusionsThis review suggests that biofeedback in early postoperative rehabilitation after TKA is effective in improving gait symmetry, reducing pain and increasing activity level. It should be noted that the great variety of devices used for feedback limits comparisons between studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIa.

Indexed as

GaitRange of Motion, ArticularAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiofeedback, PsychologyCross-Sectional StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBiofeedbackRehabilitationTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30334150
OpenAlexW2897621388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.