Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30334108›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018

Machine Meets Biology: a Primer on Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology and Cardiac Imaging.

Matthew E Dilsizian, Eliot L Siegel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Subtyping Social Determinants of Health inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial intelligence opportunities in cardio-oncology: Overview with spotlight on electrocardiography.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022
    Article
  13. Myocardial strain imaging in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew E DilsizianUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eliot L SiegelUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. esiegel@umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAn understanding of the basics concepts of deep learning can be helpful in not only understanding the potential applications of this technique but also in critically reviewing literature in which neural networks are utilized for analysis and modeling. RECENT

findingsThe term "deep learning" has been applied to a subset of machine learning that utilizes a "neural network" and is often used interchangeably with "artificial intelligence." It has been increasingly utilized in healthcare for computational "learning", especially for pattern recognition for diagnostic imaging. Another promising application is the potential for these neural networks to improve the accuracy in the identification of patients who are at risk for cardiovascular events and could benefit most from preventive treatment in comparison with more conventional statistical techniques. The importance of such tailored cardiovascular risk assessment and disease management in individual patients is far reaching given that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Nearly half of myocardial infarctions and strokes occur in patients who are not predicted to be at risk for cardiovascular events by current guideline-based approaches. Equally important are individuals who are not at risk for cardiovascular events and yet are given expensive and unnecessary preventive treatment with potential untoward side effects. The application of powerful artificial intelligence/deep learning tools in medicine is likely to result in more effective and efficient health care delivery with the potential for significant cost savings by shifting preventative treatment from inappropriate to appropriate patient subgroups.

Indexed as

CardiologyDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceCardiac Imaging TechniquesCardiovascular DiseasesHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceBig dataCardiac imagingConvolutional neural networksElectronic health recordsMachine learningNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID30334108
OpenAlexW2896110118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.