Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333957›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2018

An

Arjanneke F van de Merbel, Geertje van der Horst, Maaike H van der Mark, Janneke I M van Uhm, Erik J van Gennep, Peter Kloen, Lijkele Beimers, Rob C M Pelger, Gabri van der Pluijm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A hitchhiker's guide to cancer models.Trends in biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arjanneke F van de MerbelDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Geertje van der HorstDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Maaike H van der MarkDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Janneke I M van UhmDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Erik J van GennepDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Peter KloenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lijkele BeimersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, MC Slotervaart, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rob C M PelgerDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Gabri van der PluijmDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urological malignancies, including prostate and bladder carcinoma, represent a major clinical problem due to the frequent occurrence of therapy resistance and the formation of incurable distant metastases. As a result, there is an urgent need for versatile and predictive disease models for the assessment of the individualized drug response in urological malignancies. Compound testing on

Indexed as

bladder cancercompound testingex vivo tissue culturepersonalized medicineprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30333957
PMCPMC6176278
OpenAlexW2895756789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.